Answer:
unconstitutional because of its excessive approach.
Explanation:
As you may already know, all US states are subject to federal laws, which must be obeyed throughout the United States. However, all states in the country have the autonomy to formulate their own legislation that will be valid for the entire territory of the state, as long as it does not go against any federal law. There is a federal regulation that states that it is not allowed to hinder or prevent interstate commerce. From this we can state that the statute created and approved by the state of Vermont, which prohibits the sale of any maple syrup not produced in Vermont, is unconstitutional.
This statute is unconstitutional because, in addition to having an excessive approach, it goes against a federal norm.
This link should answer your question:
https://www.getrichslowly.org/how-to-achieve-long-term-financial-goals/
Answer:
improved access to communication, increased exposure to Western culture, threatened traditional values
Explanation:
Answer: B. Continue building homes and running farms, while also managing apartments
Explanation:
In increasing level of specialization, the best thing to do is to expand in most cases. Expansion gives room for more resources to come. Building more homes and managing them is a sector known as real estate which yields reasonable income, building more would yield more income. While, still running the farm is a great idea and with consistency comes expansion.
If Malala would’ve stayed in mingles the taliban would’ve probably tried to kill her again
