Answer:They are widely believed to have significant consequences for states' security, but agreement stops there. In the debate over their consequences, one side holds that arms races increase the probability of war by undermining military stability and straining political relations.The United States' use of nuclear weapons to end World War II led to a determined and soon successful effort by the Soviet Union to acquire such weapons, followed by a long-running nuclear arms race between the two superpowers. The Soviet Union conducted its first nuclear test in 1949.In 1949, the USSR tested its first atomic bomb. This led to a race between the two superpowers to amass the most powerful nuclear weapons with the most effective delivery systems. ... Tension was greatly increased as a result of the developing arms race which served to militarise both sides and bring war closer.
Explanation:
(happy to help)
Life on a farm in the 1800s was not easy. ... Around the middle part of the 1800s, most farmers in the Midwest lived in single room log cabins. Injuries were very common while farming with these tools. Though these injuries occured, at least the soil was very rich and full of nutrients.
Answer:
If demand increases and supply remains unchanged, then it leads to higher equilibrium price and higher quantity.
Explanation:
hope this helps you
A basic charter of human liberties containing the principles that inspired the French Revolution.
Answer:
No certainly because the late 1990s and the late 2000s became a very unsuccessful years for super powers as many countries gained economic and atomic power. The thing is that we are in a verge of war and it can occur if a brink is exploited. This era has many hard times like quantum physics and nanotechnology twice exploited causing casualties.
Explanation:
