Answer: B
Explanation:
It’s the only one that actually makes sense
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Otonomi dalam manajemen pada dasarnya berarti memberikan banyak kebebasan untuk membuat pilihan di tempat kerja. Seorang manajer yang memberikan otonomi karyawan biasanya menguraikan tujuan suatu proyek tetapi memungkinkan karyawan untuk memutuskan cara terbaik untuk mencapai tujuan itu.
2. Otonomi daerah memiliki keunggulan dalam memberikan kewenangan kebijaksanaan dan inovasi kepada daerah, memungkinkan perwakilan yang lebih besar dalam proses pengaturan daerah, dan membangun keadilan hukum yang lebih baik. Kelemahan ini memicu penyimpangan oleh kepala daerah sehingga mereka terseret ke dalam kasus hukum, dan memperbesar potensi konflik kewenangan antara pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah
3.
Ada dua aliran utama penelitian yang mengevaluasi hubungan antara manusia
praktik dan kinerja sumber daya. Yang pertama adalah universalisme atau "praktik terbaik"
pendekatan. Mereka yang menggunakan pendekatan ini menunjuk ke temuan dukungan berulang untuk menunjukkan
bahwa beberapa praktik SDM, seperti intensitas perekrutan, peluang karier internal,
penilaian kinerja, sistem pelatihan formal, pembagian keuntungan, dan kompensasi insentif
didokumentasikan dengan sangat baik dalam berbagai konteks untuk menunjukkan bahwa ada universalitasnya
Answer:
Explanation:
. The Bill of Rights
the rights of every citizen.
2. Freedom of
allows people to gather and share their
opinions.
3. In order for accused people to receive fair treatment, the Fifth Amendment
has a
clause.
4. The Fifth Amendment protects people from
so that they
cannot be tried twice for the same crime.
5. People are allowed to
the government
and ask for changes.
6. People who are born or
in the United States can vote.
7. The Nineteenth Amendment is for woman
8. A President can only be elected to two
Two examples of real-life instances where a person might engage in an error in reasoning and, as a result, come to a faulty conclusion about something that they observed are:
1. Concluding that a person is harsh because his face is not cheerful.
2. Predicting that it will rain because the weather is gloomy.
<h3>What is a Faulty Conclusion?</h3>
A faulty conclusion is reached when the pattern of reasoning is faulty. Before a conclusion can be reached on a matter, it is vital to test the observations beyond all reasonable doubts.
If this is not done, the probability of reaching a faulty conclusion will be high.
Learn more about faulty conclusions here:
brainly.com/question/2141635
Answer:
This assertion is false
Explanation:
The freedom of self-incrimination protects the everybody irrespective of whether he's innocent or guilty by limiting the power of the government.
This means that nobody (including Paul) can be compelled to be a witness against himself or forced to say anything against his wish
The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution establishes the privilege against self- incrimination. This prevents the government from forcing a person to testify against himself
Hence, Paul has the right against self-incrimination
