C.4 ounces is the correct answer
My reasoning - 16 ounces in a lb
Answer, step-by-step explanation:
A. With the previous exercise we can deduce that there is the situation of a number of sales in a grocery store, the relative frequency for the number of units sold, is shown below:
units sold. relative frequency. Acumulative frequency. interval of random numbers
30. 0.16. 0.16. 0.00 <0.16
40. 0.24. 0.4. 0.16 <0.4
50. 0.3. 0.7. 0.4 <0.7
60. 0.2. 0.9. 0.7<09
70. 0.1. 1. 0.9<1
B. For the next point, they give us some random numbers and then it is compared with the simulation of 10 days in sales:
random Units
number. sold
0.12. 30
0.96. 70
0.53. 50
0.80. 60
0.95. 70
0.10. 30
0.40. 50
0.45. 50
0.77. 60
0.29. 40
the two lists are compared so that opposite each one is the result of the simulation
Answer:
I do not agree because Mario's claim is not general.
Step-by-step explanation:
Prime numbers: These are a set of numbers that are divisible by 1 and itself only. Examples are: 2, 3, 5, 7. 11 etc.
And a denominator is the divisor in a given fraction.
Considering the following fractions whose denominators are prime numbers:
= 0.66666666...
= 0.142857142
= 0.45454545...
= 0.23076923
= 0.142857142
It could be observed that Mario's claim is not a general principle which is applicable to all fractions with a prime denominator. Thus, I do not agree with his claim.
