Answer:
b. False
Explanation:
John promised to pay Bill if he painted the garage by Friday but John called him to cancel the deal before he began to do the task and he didn't even buy the supplies. So, John won't be obligated to pay Bill $100 if he buys the supplies and paints John's garage because John let him know that the deal was off before he had bought anything. According to that, the statement is false.
>true< hope this helps have a fantastic day :D
The answer is letter A.
Tokugawa’s sons controlled the cities of Mito, Wakayama, and Nagoya. The Tokugawa clan<span> is considered as one of the powerful family during their era. <span>The Tokugawa family consists of three houses, this includes the Mito, Owari (Nagoya city), and the Kishu (Wakayama city).</span></span>
Answer:
Economies.
Explanation:
The is also referred to as European Recovery Program and it was an assistance program of the United States of America to Western Europe. It was enacted by the 80th US Congress and signed into law on the 3rd of April, 1948 by President Harry S. Truman.
The US-sponspored program was revealed by the U.S Secretary of State, George C. Marshall and it was focused on promoting general welfare, global peace, and national interest through strong economic and financial interventions.
Hence, the goal of the Marshall Plan was to help countries in Western Europe resist communism through strong economies by stimulating an effective level of production and by extension the buying and selling of goods between various countries (world trade).
The correct answers are The Fifth and Sixth Amendment
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona was a legal case in 1966, in this, Ernesto Miranda accused of kidnapping and sexual abuse confessed during the interrogation, which led to a sentence of about 20 years. However, Miranda was never told he could have counsel or guidance of a lawyer, he could remain in silence, or his words would be used against him, which means he was not informed of his rights and the legal procedure was not followed. Due to this, the Supreme Court determined the trial and process had not been legal and a retrial was necessary.
Moreover, this decision was related to the fifth amendment that protects against self-incrimination including the right to not answer questions against oneself; as well as, the sixth amendment that establishes a public, speedy and fair trial should be guaranteed. Thus, this case addressed the fifth and sixth amendments.
