Answer:
Paired Comparison
Explanation:
Paired Comparison is a type of job evaluation method in which individual jobs are evaluated in relation to every other job, based on a ranking system, and an overall score is given for each job, determining the highest-valued job to the lowest-valued job. Here in paired comparison method an employee's work is basically evaluated by looking to every job being performed in that organisation, then after doing the comparison the relative scores are assigned to the job which needs to be evaluated. This method is different to the methods which most organisation use where jobs are evaluated specifically on the basis of your skills, performance and your knowledge. One of the drawback which this method has is that the employees start comparing themselves with other employees, not their job but their personalities and knowledge etc. which in turn creates jealousy factor which in return can decrease the overall performance of organisation.
Answer:
A. D1 = 1.50*1.06 = 1.59
D2 = 1.59*1.06 = 1.69
D3 = 1.69*1.06 = 1.79
B. PV of D1=(1.50*1.06)/1.13^1=1.41
PV of D2=(1.50*1.06^2)/1.13^2=1.32
PV of D3=(1.50*1.06^3)/1.13^3=1.24
PV of all dividend = (1.50*1.06)/1.13^1 + (1.5*1.06^2)/1.13^2 + (1.5*1.06^3)/1.13^3
PV of all dividend = 1.59/1.13 + 1.6854/1.2769 + 1.786524/1.442897
PV of all dividend = 1.407079646 + 1.319915 + 1.238150748
PV of all dividend = 3.965145814288893
PV of all dividend = 3.97
C. PV = 27.05/(1+13%)^3
PV = 27.05/(1.13)^3
PV = 27.05/1.442897
PV = 18.74701
PV = 18.75
D. The most you should pay for it
:
= (1.50*1.06)/1.13^1+(1.5*1.06^2)/1.13^2+(1.5*1.06^3)/1.13^3+27.05/1.13^3
=22.71
E. Value = (1.50*1.06)/(13%-6%)
Value = 1.59 / 7%
Value = 1.59 / 0.07
Value = 22.714286
Value =22.71
F. No, the value is not dependent on the holding period, you can see from above that the value of infinite time period estimated in E equals to the value calculated when there was 3 years holding period.
Answer: It is not ethical
Explanation:
Ethics is defined as a moral philosophy that is good for individuals and the society at large.
The basic principles of ethics are objectivity , professional due - care and competence, professional behavior , integrity and confidentiality.
The act of intimidation by the retail chain is un ethical as it is not to the benefit of the suppliers, Moreover , this act violates the principle of professional behavior and integrity.
A good ethical practice respects the trading policies of business partners.
Answer:
$45,600 and yes
Explanation:
The computation of the contribution to profit from the special order is shown below:
= Sales revenue - Material cost - Labor cost
where,
Sales revenue = $3,300 × 40 slabs = $132,000
Material cost = $1,440 × 40 slabs = $57,600
Labor cost = = $7200 × 40 slabs = $28,800
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= $132,000 - $57,600 - $28,800
= $45,600
The material and labor cost is a variable cost and the same is taken in the computation part
So, it should accept the special order
That statements is true
Manufacturer is a type of business that transform raw materials into a sellable goods, so technically they can be considered as a producer in the market.
Retailers is someone that sell the goods that produced by the manufacturers to the consumers.
So, in this case, they did perform both production and retailing activities