All categories

2 years ago

What is 9 5/9-6 5/6 I seem to not get the right answer every time I try

2 answers:

6 0

If you would like to solve 9 5/9 - 6 5/6, you can calculate this using the following steps:

9 5/9 - 6 5/6 = 86/9 - 41/6 = 516/54 - 369/54 = (516 - 369) / 54 = 147/54 = 49/18 = 2 13/18

The correct result would be 2 13/18.

Afina-wow [57]2 years ago

5 0

9 (.6) -6 (.83)

9 x .6 = 5.4

5.4 -6 (.83)

-0.6 x .83= -0.498

the answer will be 0 or -0.498

You might be interested in

name the lengths of the sides of three rectangles with perimeters of 14 units. use only whole numbers.

Lady bird [3.3K]

rectangle 1: 6 units by 1 unit

rectangle 2: 5 units by 2 units

rectangle 3: 4 units by 3 units

3 0

2 years ago

For each of the following, use logic laws to decide whether the statement is a tautology contradiction, or neither. a (a) (A B)

spayn [35]

Answer:

The statement $(A\rightarrow \lnot B)\land (B\rightarrow A)$ is a contingency.

The statement $(P\rightarrow \lnot P)\land P$ is a contradiction.

Step-by-step explanation:

A tautology is a proposition that is always true.

A contradiction is a proposition that is always false.

A contingency is a proposition that is neither a tautology nor a contradiction.

a) To classify the statement $(A\rightarrow \lnot B)\land (B\rightarrow A)$ , you need to use the logic laws as follows:

$(A\rightarrow \lnot B)\land (B\rightarrow A) \equiv$

$\equiv (\lnot A \lor\lnot B)\land(\lnot B \lor A)$ by the logical equivalence involving conditional statement.

$\equiv (\lnot B\lor \lnot A )\land(\lnot B \lor A)$ by the Commutative law.

$\equiv \lnot B \lor (\lnot A \land A)$ by Distributive law.

$\equiv \lnot B \lor (A \land \lnot A)$ by the Commutative law.

$\equiv \lnot B \lor F$ by the Negation law.

Therefore the statement $(A\rightarrow \lnot B)\land (B\rightarrow A)$ is a contingency.

b) To classify the statement $(P\rightarrow \lnot P)\land P$ , you need to use the logic laws as follows:

$(P\rightarrow \lnot P)\land P \equiv$

$\equiv (\lnot P \lor \lnot P)\land P$ by the logical equivalence involving conditional statement.

$\equiv P \land (\lnot P \lor \lnot P)$ by the Commutative law.

$\equiv (P \land \lnot P) \lor (P \land \lnot P)$ by Distributive law.

$\equiv F \lor F \equiv F$ by the Negation law.

Therefore the statement $(P\rightarrow \lnot P)\land P$ is a contradiction.

8 0

2 years ago

Solve each system of equations below by substitution

Anna007 [38]

Answer:

numero uno, ok

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Which of the following is considered a model for enzyme action

sergij07 [2.7K]

Answer choices? I can try and figure it out if there are choices

8 0

2 years ago

-2x + 3x - 5 = 6 - 21<br><br> FIND x

trasher [3.6K]

Before we do any solving, we need to simplify both sides.

On the left, we can simplify -2x + 3x - 5 to x - 5.

On the right, we can simplify 6 - 21 to -16.

So we have x - 5 = -16.

Solving from here, we add 5 to both sides to get x = -11.

5 0

2 years ago