Answer:A. Leontief assumed that U.S. and foreign technologies were the same, while the Heckscher-Ohlin model assumes they are different
B. Leontief ignored land abundance in the United States
D. Leontief’s test distinguished between skilled and unskilled labor, but ignored capital.
Explanation:Leontief paradox is a Russian-American economist, his work was based on the work of Wassily W. Leontief he attempted to test the Heckscher–Ohlin theory ("H–O theory") empirically.
in economics tries to explain that a country with a higher capital per worker has a lower Capital per labor ratio in export than when compared to Import.
LEONTIEF IGNORED THE ABUNDANCE OF LAND IN MAKING HIS ASSUMPTIONS
HE ALSO CLASSIFIED THE U.S TECHNOLOGY AND OTHERS AS THE SAME WHICH IS NOT IN LINE WITH THE H-O MODEL ASSUMPTION.
LEONTIEF THEORY IGNORED CAPITAL DURING HIS TEST.
Answer:
controllable margin = $100,000
Explanation:
given data
Income tax expense = $62000
Contribution margin = 180000
fixed costs = 80000
Interest expense = 68000
Total operating assets = 40000
to find out
How much is controllable margin
solution
we get here controllable margin that is express as
controllable margin = contribution - controllable fixed cost ....................1
put here value we get
controllable margin = 180000 - 80000
controllable margin = $100,000
Answer:
A person whose salary has increased is able to purchase fewer goods and services.
Explanation:
Inflation is characterized by an increase in the prices of goods and services along with a reduction in the purchasing power.
Real income of an individual refers to the income which has been adjusted for the effects of inflation. Whereas, Nominal income refers to the income which is before any such adjustment for inflation.
In the given case, the nominal income has increased i.e if we ignore inflation. But while considering inflation, the real income of the individual has reduced evidenced by the fact that the purchasing power has reduced.
Answer:
The answer to this question is option C. $560
Explanation:
We can let the price of each hollow pine door = d and of each solid oak door = 2d.
Since each pine door = 40, d = 40, and the regular price of each solid oak door is (2)(4) = 80.
With a 25% discount, each solid oak door is 0.75(80) = 60.
So, the six oak doors cost 6 x 60 = 360 dollars, and the five pine doors cost 5 x 40 = 200 dollars. Thus, the total is 560 dollars.
Hence the answer is C
Answer:
cohesion
Explanation:
i think its cohesion because the word means to unite and if the understanding is high then when they combine it would be greater. im not 100% though
