1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Svetlanka [38]
3 years ago
11

Cuáles son las características sociales de una mujer​

Social Studies
1 answer:
Marianna [84]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

¿Te refieres a su papel en la sociedad? cual es el contexto

Explanation:

Es mejor que esto no sea una mierda sexista >:/

You might be interested in
(q020) in contemporary u.s. society, men suffer more from gender inequality as individuals, while women are harmed more as a gro
Mumz [18]

Answer:

In contemporary u.s. society, men suffer more from gender inequality as individuals, while women are harmed more as a group. This is because, <em><u>men are harmed by androcentrism alone and women by androcentrism, </u></em><em><u>and subordination.</u></em>

7 0
2 years ago
Why have some criticized utilitarianism on the basis that it is the ‘morality of swine’? How does Mill address this objection?
Elodia [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

As a theory, utilitarianism is usually thought to start with Jeremy Bentham, however, similar ideas were evident in the writings of David Hume in An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals (1)and Francis Hutchinson, whom David Hume studied under, in his An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue (2). Utilitarianism tells us an act is moral insofar as it creates the greatest good for the greatest number. It tells us to take the amount of happiness distributed between sentient beings and look at which distribution is going to maximise the amount of happiness. It gives a systematic answer. Throughout the past two centuries utilitarianism has been very influential within practical disciplines of politics and economics. As a result, utilitarianism has had an influence modern life, particularly public policy. What could be more important when making political deliberations than aiming to make people’s lives better and less unhappy?

One of the first utilitarian theorisers, Jeremy Bentham, is famously credited for being the founder of the doctrine. Bentham defined utility as “instrumental to happiness”. He believes that all judgements of good and bad can be based on pleasure and pain. He is seen as an advocate of psychological hedonism. In his famous introduction of An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1979), Bentham states “Nature has placed man under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure.” Therefore, pain and pleasure provide the basis for his moral theory of ‘what we ought to do’. Initially, he began his career by studying law and then moved on to moral ethics in order to advise legislators. He was primarily interested in improving the law and his goal for the legislator was the utilitarian principle or the greatest happiness principle. Therefore, his advice was not initially aimed for individuals and their life choices but for the legislator. Although Bentham sees pleasure as the key of explaining how human beings act, he relies more often on the concept of pain when constructing his legal theory. While he does endorse act-utilitarianism, his ‘sanction-based’ theory of obligation is more applicable to the legal system he was so interested in improving.

John Stuart Mill is also one of the most well-known utilitarian thinkers and defenders of the theory. His celebrated thoughts can be found in his famous essay: Utilitarianism. Mill observes something of a crisis in moral thinking. Philosophical thinkers have been unable to come to a consensus on the principle of what constitutes right and wrong. Mill argues that having such a foundation is necessary to legitimise morality. This is why the theory of utilitarianism is so important.

Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill categorise and measure utility and pleasure in different ways. Bentham uses the hedonic calculus which decides the value of pleasure by seven measures of quantity: duration, intensity, certainty or uncertainty, remoteness or propinquity, fecundity, extent and purity. Bentham is well-known for his treating of all pleasures as of equal value. By this he means not that all pleasures are of exactly equal, but that the legislator who his work on utilitarianism is aimed at should not be valuing one pleasure above another.

John Stuart Mil’s idea of higher and lower pleasures has been viewed as flawed in itself. It has been criticised as a self-serving idea. For example, an intellectual will view his preferred enjoyments as a higher, more important pleasure. Therefore, as an intellectual, it could be argued that Mill himself is biased towards what constitutes as higher and lower pleasures.

6 0
2 years ago
The concepts of theory x and theory y contributed to which major management perspective?
scoundrel [369]

'The concepts of theory x and theory y contributed behavioral perspective management.

While Theory X emphasizes the necessity of increased monitoring, outside rewards, and penalties, Theory Y emphasizes the significance of job pleasure as a motivator and encourages employees to approach jobs without direct supervision.

The behavioral perspective, which is all about acting in life as a result of some kind of motive or incentive, is made up of the concepts of theory X and theory Y. It has to do with the motivations behind a person's participation in a specific action rather than their response.

Instead than focusing on inward processes like intellect, this strategy places more emphasis on taught behaviors. To put it another way, behavioral psychologists study psychology through observing people's behaviors and actions.

To learn more about behavioral perspective visit brainly.com/question/11012390?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
MESOPOTAMIA 
hjlf
The wealth of these city-states were flourishing, and it is visible because of the infrastructure being built. Note that better infrastructure is an opportunity for better trade. Trade = wealth.
8 0
3 years ago
What is "the paradox of plenty?"
Y_Kistochka [10]

The correct answer is B. The Paradox of Plenty (also known as the Resource Curse) refers to how the discovery an abundance of natural resources (such as oils, fossil fuels and minerals), does not necessarily mean that the nation in question will have a major economic growth, in fact, it usually results in less democracy, and worse development outcomes than countries with fewer natural resources. This impacts the country very negatively and reduces productive activity drastically.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Jackie is doing a study on the number of hours spent watching TV and how this affects family cohesion. She decides to mail a que
    9·1 answer
  • In order to be classified as a society, what are the two key qualities that a group of people must share?
    10·1 answer
  • What is meant by energy?list it various sources​
    7·2 answers
  • Supply-siders' policy recommendations include: a. lower tax rates, spending increases, and decreased government regulation. b. l
    9·1 answer
  • What are the expressed powers of the legislative branch?
    9·1 answer
  • Lobelia's Nursery and Garden Resource Center has long provided high-quality, typical types of seasonal bedding plants to custome
    14·1 answer
  • Earl has broad practical knowledge, emotional maturity, and the ability to apply his knowledge to make life more worthwhile. ear
    15·2 answers
  • Are they contracts in the black market?
    9·1 answer
  • Can yall help me please
    8·1 answer
  • What is the status of ich in u.s.?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!