Answer:
Explanation to the following question is as follows;
Explanation:
Because they impede progress, bad social customs obstruct social peace and harmony. Poor social practises, particularly those that oppress women and minorities, result in fewer individuals having the opportunity to step up and do something to improve society. These individuals may become dissatisfied and resist or protest against these methods, resulting in instability.
What???? provide a picture
Texicans organizing themselves to influence government is a Fundamental right.
There are <u>four types of rights:</u>
- Legal rights: They come from other acts of legislation.
- Fundamental rights: They are provided in the constitution.
- Human rights
- Cultural rights
The <u>Fundamental rights</u> include the following:
- Right to liberty
- Right to self-determination
- Right to freedom of movement
- Right to due process of law
- Right to freedom of thought
- Right to freedom of religion
- Right to freedom of expression
- Right to freedom of association
- Right to freedom of assembly
In this particular case, Texicans are using their <u>right to freedom of assembly</u>, which is defined as: The right of people to <u>collectively express and pursue their shared ideas</u>.
Answer:
A. both Jonathan's and Joanna's cases
Explanation:
Legal implication: The term "legal implication" is described as a phenomenon that is considered as the consequences or results in which an individual in being involved something inappropriate according to the specific law. Legal implications can either be negative or positive.
Ethical implication: The term "ethical implication" is described as a phenomenon in which various matter is being considered based on an ethical viewpoint. It is considered as the human principle based on wrong and right.
In the question above, the correct answer is A.