Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
Subtract the two equations: 8y=0
y=0
x=-8
The answer is 3_4/11. The "_" indicates it's not the same number. So you don't get confused.
When repeating, you put a 99. Not 100. So, this will be 36/99. Now, you simplify. Also add the 3. You then get 3_4/11.
Proof:
x=0.6...
10x=6.6...
-x=0.6...
9x=6
x=2/3
2/3=0.6...
Answer:
The given statement is true.
In general, the growth rate of exponential functions is far greater than the quadratic function. This can be illustrated through an example.
Consider an exponential function and a quadratic function .
Note that the leading coefficient of the quadratic function is far greater than the base of the exponential function but still the exponential function will exceeds the quadratic function after x = 15.664 as shown in the graph below.
Therefore, we can conclude that the given statement is correct.
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
A geometric sequence has a common ratio r between consecutive terms
A
4 ÷ 2 = 2
6 ÷ 4 = 1.5
Thus not a geometric sequence
B
1 ÷ 1 = 1
2 ÷ 1 = 2
Thus not a geometric sequence
C
÷ 1 =
÷ =
÷ =
D
4 ÷ 7 = 
1 ÷ 4 =
Thus not a geometric sequence
Then the geometric sequence is C
