Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
What do you mean? I don't understand.
Answer:
1:1
Explanation:
According to my research on different types of relationships between two variables, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the entities PROFESSOR and DEPARTMENT exhibit a 1:1 relationship. In other words there can only be one Professor per Department and vice-versa.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Scanner;
public class num4 {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Scanner in = new Scanner(System.in);
System.out.println("How many numbers? ");
int n = in.nextInt();
int []intArray = new int[n];
//Entering the values
for(int i=0; i<intArray.length;i++){
System.out.println("Enter the numbers");
intArray[i]=in.nextInt();
}
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(intArray));
int min =intArray[0];
for(int i =0; i<intArray.length; i++){
if(min>intArray[i]){
min = intArray[i];
}
}
System.out.println("The Minimum of the numbers is "+min);
}
}
Explanation:
- Using Java programming language
- Prompt the user for the number of values
- Using Scanner class receive and store in a variable
- Create an array of size n
- Using an for loop continuously ask the user to enter the integers
- Print the array of integers
- Using another for loop with an if statement, find the smallest element in the array of numbers
- Output the the smallest number
