Betty stopped running half of the way through the run.

property of real numbers that states that the order in which numbers are added or multiplied dose not change the value

timurjin [86]

Answer:

"Commutative property of addition and of multiplication"

Step-by-step explanation:

This is the "commutative property" of addition and of multiplication. That as its name indicates tells us for additions, that if we add A + B, or B + A, we should get the same result. Similarly, the "commutative property" of multiplication tells us that if we perform the product A * B we should get the same answer as if we perform the product: B * A.

7 0

4 years ago

A sample of 200 observations from the first population indicated that x1 is 170. A sample of 150 observations from the second po

igor_vitrenko [27]

Answer:

a) For this case the value of the significanceis $\alpha=0.05$ and $\alpha/2 =0.025$ , we need a value on the normal standard distribution thataccumulates 0.025 of the area on each tail and we got:

$z_{\alpha/2} =1.96$

If the calculated statistic $|z_{calc}| >1.96$ we can reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance

b) Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{170+110}{200+150}=0.8$

c) $z=\frac{0.85-0.733}{\sqrt{0.8(1-0.8)(\frac{1}{200}+\frac{1}{150})}}=2.708$

d) Since the calculated value satisfy this condition 2.708>1.96 we have enough evidence at 5% of significance that we have a significant difference between the two proportions analyzed.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

$X_{1}=170$ represent the number of people with the characteristic 1

$X_{2}=110$ represent the number of people with the characteristic 2

$n_{1}=200$ sample 1 selected

$n_{2}=150$ sample 2 selected

$p_{1}=\frac{170}{200}=0.85$ represent the proportion estimated for the sample 1

$p_{2}=\frac{110}{150}=0.733$ represent the proportion estimated for the sample 2

$\hat p$ represent the pooled estimate of p

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the value for the test (variable of interest)

$\alpha=0.05$ significance level given

Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if is there is a difference between the two proportions, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} = p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} \neq p_{2}$

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}$ (1)

a.State the decision rule.

For this case the value of the significanceis $\alpha=0.05$ and $\alpha/2 =0.025$ , we need a value on the normal standard distribution thataccumulates 0.025 of the area on each tail and we got:

$z_{\alpha/2} =1.96$

If the calculated statistic $|z_{calc}| >1.96$ we can reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance

b. Compute the pooled proportion.

Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{170+110}{200+150}=0.8$

c. Compute the value of the test statistic.

z-test: Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine whether the means of two groups are equal to each other.

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:

$z=\frac{0.85-0.733}{\sqrt{0.8(1-0.8)(\frac{1}{200}+\frac{1}{150})}}=2.708$

d. What is your decision regarding the null hypothesis?

Since the calculated value satisfy this condition 2.708>1.96 we have enough evidence at 5% of significance that we have a significant difference between the two proportions analyzed.

5 0

3 years ago

The formula to find the perimeter of a rectangle is: P = 2W + 2L. To solve for " W " in this formula, which steps should be foll

netineya [11]

Since the 2L is not being multiplied or divided, and it's positive, we will subtract it from both sides. Since the W is being multiplied by the 2, we'll also need to divide both sides by 2.

Your answer is B.
<em>
</em><em>Don't forget to rate this answer the Brainliest!</em>

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

/

vazorg [7]

Answer:

sorry, i haven't understood your question!! how can i tell which statement is false.

4 0

3 years ago

The rainfall total two years ago was 10.2 inches. Last year's total was 20% greater. What was last year's rainfall total?

Nataly_w [17]

10.2+10.2*20/100= 12.24 inches