Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
Yes they did because the some of the Hebrew were god people. So they did not want it to turn into a statue to worship it
Answer: This dog training is accomplished through RESPONSE CHAINING.
Explanation: Response chaining can be defined as a set of individually shaped behaviours that precedes one another in order to form a cohesive set of behaviours.
For example, the chain in going to work via public transit starts with going to the bus stop, waiting for the bus, which then leads to entering the bus, and finally alighting at your destination.
Answer:
D. Do a search to see if multiple outlets you trust are also covering the same story
