Answer:
648
Step-by-step explanation:
Running this in Python, with the code as follows,
import math
cur_numbers = [0] * 3
num = 0
for i in range(100, 1000):
cur_numbers[2] = i % 10
i = math.floor(i/10)
cur_numbers[1] = i % 10
i = math.floor(i/10)
cur_numbers[0] = i % 10
if(len(set(cur_numbers)) == 3):
num += 1
print(cur_numbers)
print(num), we get 648 as our answer.
Another way to solve this is as follows:
There are 9 possibilities for the hundreds digit (1-9). Then, there are 10 possibilities for the tens digit, but we subtract 1 because it can't be the 1 same digit as the hundreds digit. For the ones digit, there are 10 possibilities, but we subtract 1 because it can't be the same as the hundreds digit and another 1 because it can't be the same as the tens digit. Multiplying these out, we have
9 possibilities for the hundreds digit x 9 possibilities for the tens digit x 8 possibilities for the ones digit = 648
Answer:
Neither parallel nor perpendicular
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm assuming you meant line k is y = 3x -2. If not, this is wrong.
For this, you need to put both lines in point-slope form, or the form that line k is already in. This means you only need to convert line m.
-2r + 6v = 18
6v = 2r + 18
v = 2/6r + 18/6
v = 1/3r + 3
Now you can answer the question.
To be parallel, lines must have the same slope (but a different y-intercept). 3 and 1/3 are not the same, so the lines are not parallel.
To be perpendicular, one line must have the opposite reciprocal (fraction flipped and + goes to - or - to +) of the other. While 3 is the reciprocal of 1/3, they are both positive, so they are not perpendicular.
To be the same line, the equations must be absolutely identical, which they aren't.
This leaves the last option: neither.
Let me know if you need a more in-depth explanation of anything here! I'm happy to help!
The answer is D, which is 32. Hope this helps.
Answer:
You're correct. x = 24.
Step-by-step explanation:
:)
69. Oh yes the memes indeed.
