<h2>Long short story: I tried ;-; </h2>
this is an isosceles triangle... meaning that the two base angles will be equal.
180 - 38 = 142
142 / 2 = 71
x = 71
There isn't enough info to prove the triangles to be congruent or not. So we can't say for sure either way.
We have angle CAD = angle ACB given by the arc markings, and we know that AC = AC due to the reflexive theorem. However we are missing one third piece of information.
That third piece of info could be....
- AD = BC which allows us to use SAS
- angle ACD = angle CAB which allows us to use ASA
- angle ABC = angle CDA which allows us to use AAS (slight variation of ASA)
Since we don't know any of those three facts, we simply don't have enough information.
side note: If AB = CD, then this leads to SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem. If we had two congruent sides, the angle must be between the two sides, which is what AD = BC allows.
Answer:
(5 x + 1) - (-10 x + 6)
5x +1 + 10x - 6
25x - 5
Step-by-step explanation:
(x - 2) - (6x - 9)
x - 2 - 6x + 9 =
-5x +7
(5 x + 1) - (-10 x + 6)
5x +1 + 10x - 6
25x - 5
-4 x + 2 x + 7 - 3 x
-5x + 7
(4 x + 3) + (-9 x + 4)
4x +3 -9x + 4
-5x + 7
2x + 8.....factor = 2(x + 4)
