Answer:
The Kmart was held by the court not liable because David assumed the risks of sledding.
Explanation:
Negligent actions are those actions that come under the rubric of tort actions. To prove negligent actions against a person or a company, the plaintiff is required to prove four things in court– duty, breach, causation, and damages.
In the given case, the court will not be held Kmart liable because David (the consumer) was aware of the risks involved in the sledding. Therefore, the case of negligent actions is not applicable for Kmart.
<span>Women were able to find more employment on the in America during WW2, as many jobs typically staffed by men were being vacated due to the increased need for manpower in the military.</span>
Answer:
$6 billion
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what consumption spending would initially decrease by
Using this formula
Decrease in Consumption spending=MPC * New taxes on household income
Let plug in the formula
Decrease in Consumption spending=0.6*$10 billion
Decrease in Consumption spending=$6 billion
Therefore consumption spending would initially decrease by $6 billion
Answer: True
Explanation: There is always that opportunity to perfect existing industry standards and several analysis would have already be done which saves you a great deal of financial stress and a possible loss.
