Marsha deposited $7,000 into a savings account years ago. The simple interest rate is 4%. How much money did Marsha earn in i
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Part A:
Given that lie <span>detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.
The case that the lie detector correctly determined that a selected person is saying the truth has a probability of 0.85
Thus p = 0.85
Thus, the probability that </span>the lie detector will conclude that all 15 are telling the truth if <span>all 15 applicants tell the truth is given by:
</span>
<span>
</span>Part B:
Given that lie detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.
The case that the lie detector wrongly determined that a selected person is lying when the person is actually saying the truth has a probability of 0.25
Thus p = 0.15
Thus, the probability that the lie detector will conclude that at least 1 is lying if all 15 applicants tell the truth is given by:
Part C:
Given that lie detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.
The case that the lie detector wrongly determined that a selected person is lying when the person is actually saying the truth has a probability of 0.15
Thus p = 0.15
The mean is given by:
Part D:
Given that lie detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.
The case that the lie detector wrongly determined that a selected person is lying when the person is actually saying the truth has a probability of 0.15
Thus p = 0.15
The <span>probability that the number of truthful applicants classified as liars is greater than the mean is given by:
</span>![P(X\ \textgreater \ \mu)=P(X\ \textgreater \ 1.9125) \\ \\ 1-[P(0)+P(1)]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28X%5C%20%5Ctextgreater%20%5C%20%5Cmu%29%3DP%28X%5C%20%5Ctextgreater%20%5C%201.9125%29%20%5C%5C%20%20%5C%5C%201-%5BP%280%29%2BP%281%29%5D)
<span>
</span>
<span>
</span>
Given that lie <span>detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.
The case that the lie detector correctly determined that a selected person is saying the truth has a probability of 0.85
Thus p = 0.85
Thus, the probability that </span>the lie detector will conclude that all 15 are telling the truth if <span>all 15 applicants tell the truth is given by:
</span>
<span>
</span>Part B:
Given that lie detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.
The case that the lie detector wrongly determined that a selected person is lying when the person is actually saying the truth has a probability of 0.25
Thus p = 0.15
Thus, the probability that the lie detector will conclude that at least 1 is lying if all 15 applicants tell the truth is given by:
Part C:
Given that lie detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.
The case that the lie detector wrongly determined that a selected person is lying when the person is actually saying the truth has a probability of 0.15
Thus p = 0.15
The mean is given by:
Part D:
Given that lie detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.
The case that the lie detector wrongly determined that a selected person is lying when the person is actually saying the truth has a probability of 0.15
Thus p = 0.15
The <span>probability that the number of truthful applicants classified as liars is greater than the mean is given by:
</span>
<span>
</span>
</span>
The angle ∠22 and angle ∠24 are congruent because they are vertically opposite angles.
<h3>What is an angle?</h3>The angle is the distance between the intersecting lines or surfaces. The angle is also expressed in degrees. The angle is 360 degrees for one complete spin.
Vertically opposite angle – When two lines intersect, then their opposite angles are equal.
Linear angle – If the total of two angles is 180 degrees, they are said to be linear angles.
The statements are given below.
∠22 = ∠24 (vertically opposite angle)
∠22 + ∠23 = 180 (linear angle)
The diagram is given below.
More about the angled link is given below.
#SPJ1
