1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andrej [43]
3 years ago
10

Which ordered pairs are in the solution set of the system of linear inequalities?

Mathematics
1 answer:
Anastaziya [24]3 years ago
8 0
<h3>Answer: Choice A.  (2,2), (3,1), (4,2)</h3>

==========================================================

Explanation:

The graph of y \ge -\frac{1}{3}x+2 has the boundary y = (-1/3)x+2 which is a solid line. This line goes through (0,2) and (3,1). We shade above the boundary because of the "greater than" sign.

The graph of y < 2x+3 has a dashed boundary line of y = 2x+3, and we shade below the boundary because of the "less than" sign.

The two regions overlap in the upper right corner where it's shaded in the darkest color. The points (2,2), (3,1) and (4,2) are in this upper right corner region. If we plug the coordinates of each point into each inequality, then we'll get true statements.

For instance, let's try (x,y) = (2,2) into the first inequality

y \ge -\frac{1}{3}x+2\\\\2 \ge -\frac{1}{3}(2)+2\\\\2 \ge -\frac{2}{3}+2\\\\2 \ge -\frac{2}{3}+\frac{6}{3}\\\\2 \ge \frac{-2+6}{3}\\\\2 \ge \frac{4}{3}\\\\2 \ge 1.33\\\\

Which is true since 2 is indeed larger than 1.33, so that confirms (2,2) is in the shaded region for y \ge -\frac{1}{3}x+2\\\\

Let's check the other inequality as well

y < 2x+3\\\\2 < 2(2)+3\\\\2 < 4+3\\\\2 < 7\\\\

That works too. So (2,2) is in BOTH shaded regions at the same time; hence, it's a solution to the system. You should find that (3,1) and (4,2) work for both inequalities also. This will confirm choice A is the answer.

--------------------------------

Extra info (optional section)

A point like (3,-1) does not work for the first inequality as shown below

y \ge -\frac{1}{3}x+2\\\\-1 \ge -\frac{1}{3}(3)+2\\\\-1 \ge -1+2\\\\-1 \ge 1\\\\

Since -1 is neither equal to 1, nor is -1 larger than 1 either. The false statement at the end indicates (3,-1) is not a solution to that inequality.

Based on the graph, the point (3,-1) is not above the blue solid boundary line. All of this means we can rule out choice B.

You should find that (1,-2) is a similar story, so we can rule out choice C. Choice D can be ruled out because (2,0) is not a solution to the first inequality.

You might be interested in
Describe and correct the error in telling whether the two figures are congruent?
Aleks04 [339]
2 figures are congruent if at least 2 sides are the same length, there angles are the same, etc
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is 11183333.3 in scientific notation
umka2103 [35]
11183333.3/10^7 = 1.11x10^-7.
8 0
3 years ago
Leslie is buying books for her upcoming semester. The cost for books is $240 and sales tax is 6%. What is the total cost of the
hodyreva [135]

Answer:

$254.40

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Find the surface area of the prism.<br> Please help!!
Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

308

Step-by-step explanation:

13 x 6 x 2 =

next

13 x 4 x 2 =

next

6 x 4 x 2 =

Add

 156

 104

+ 48

_____

308

me is in the pic

5 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELPPPPP!!!! (answer in decimal)
kakasveta [241]

Answer:

\approx 0.482659

Step-by-step explanation:

The experimental probability is the chance of an event happening based on data, or rather the experiment results, and not on a theoretical calculation. In essence, a theoretical calculation can be described by the following formula:

\frac{desired}{total}

However, the experimental probability can be described with the following formula:

\frac{number\ of\ desired\ outcomes}{number\ of \ trials}

The number of trials is the sum of the number of outcomes. In this case, the desired outcome is tails. Therefore, the experimental probability can be described using the following formula:

\frac{tails}{total}

One can also rewrite the formula as the following. This is because the total is the sum of the number of the two outcomes:

\frac{tails}{heads+tails}

Substitute,

\frac{167}{167+179}

Simplify,

\frac{167}{346}

Rewrite as a decimal:

\approx 0.482659

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • An isosceles triangle may be right or acute but never obtuse.<br> A. True<br> B. False
    13·2 answers
  • Solve the simultaneous equation y-2x+1=0 and 4x^2+3y^2-2xy=7
    10·1 answer
  • SHOW YOUR WORK AND PLEASE DON'T GUESS THANX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • The coordinates of the points represent the vertices of a rectangle. P(2,2) Q(6,2) R(6,5) S (2,5) What is the perimeter of the r
    5·1 answer
  • Two cards are drawn from a regular deck of 52 cards, without replacement. what is the probability that the first card is an ace
    8·1 answer
  • Write 20 as a product of prime factors.
    14·2 answers
  • 9) State the coordinates of the endpoints of a<br> line segment that intersects the y-axis.
    5·1 answer
  • Which fraction has a terminating decimal as a decimal expansion <br> 1/3<br> 1/5<br> 1/7 <br> 1/9
    14·1 answer
  • Solve for x. NEED ANSWER ASAP TYY SO MUCH IN ADVANCE
    12·1 answer
  • Please answer so I dont fail this semester ​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!