1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goblinko [34]
3 years ago
15

Why is the state of the union address speech fact checked

History
1 answer:
stealth61 [152]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: To ensure the President is not lying to the people.

Explanation:

The State of the Union is a very important speech by the President and acts as an official update on the affairs of the country. As a democracy, it is important that ordinary Americans know what is going on in their country.

This is why it is important that whatever the President says is fact-checked to ensure that they are not misleading the nation on how the United States is doing. The people deserve to know the truth so that they may decide whether to keep going with the current administration or whether a change is needed.

Fact-checking the State of the Union can even be said to be a patriotic act as it ensures that the country is being fed the facts.

You might be interested in
Why did the European Crusades directly lead to the Age of Exploration?
nexus9112 [7]
One way in which the European Crusades directly led to the Age of Exploration was that "<span>(D) Returning crusaders brought exotic spices, perfumes, and fabrics, </span><span>creating a new European demand for these commodities," since a main original goal of the early explorers was to find a sea-route to Asia. </span>
7 0
4 years ago
How does the Portrait of King Henry VIII shows his power and wealth?
alekssr [168]

You would be forgiven for thinking that Princess Diana had very little in common with Henry VIII or the artist Hans Holbein. But you would be wrong. The Tudors invented the portrait as a means of projecting personality, often by linking striking images with words.

If you look at any member of the Royal family in the last few hundred years capable of playing the same game, it’s the late Princess of Wales, posing alone in front of the Taj Mahal, anticipating the headlines.

In the first episode of a new series, The Genius of British Art, I will be examining how royal portraiture has reflected and defined the changing face of England. Five other presenters, including Jon Snow and Sir Roy Strong, will then explore other areas of our artistic heritage, from war art to landscapes.

In so many ways, the Tudor reign was transformative, and art is no exception. In 16th-century England, the idea of using a painting to capture and transmit the personality of a ruler was revolutionary. Until then, royal portraits consisted of a squiggle and a crown on a coin or a seal – they were merely tokens. But if you look at Hans Holbein’s 1537 portrait of Henry VIII, what you see is the man himself: there are no royal emblems, no crown, no flummery. The painting shows the King in all his thuggish dignity, a rugger player gone to seed. While paint can flatter or lie, steel in the form of a made-to-measure suit of armour with a 54-inch waist cannot. It’s clear from Henry’s surviving armour that the painting shows his actual, hulking physique.

There were two factors which drove this transformation of the portrait. One was the Renaissance: English artists and thinkers were influenced by continental Europe’s urge to recreate the lavish, realistic art of Rome. The second was the Reformation. The idea of English identity was invented in Henry’s reign after the break from the Catholic Church and Rome; you could say that he was the first Eurosceptic.


6 0
3 years ago
What were the benefits and drawbacks to Jimmy Carter’s status as a Washington, D.C. “outsider”?
julia-pushkina [17]
Many politicians, especially today, like to claim "outsider status"--in that they aren't burdened by a history in Washington. The down side to this is that they also don't have many political alliances.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What position did serfs have in feudal society?
Yanka [14]
Serfs, also known as peasants, were the lowest class of citizen in feudal societies. They were allowed to live on land own by Lords in return for labor, which was practically slavery. 
8 0
3 years ago
What did fascists believe was the role of women
Deffense [45]

Answer: The Answer Would Be:

~A. To Be Mothers And Raise Soldiers For The Nation.

sorry if its wrong

Explanation:

have a nice day

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What statement is true of Theodore Roosevelt's foreign policy?
    11·1 answer
  • What was Andrew Jackson’s opinion on gibbons vs Odgen
    12·1 answer
  • consider the arguments of both macarthur and truman about the possibility of a wider war with china. which argument do you think
    10·1 answer
  • What was the economic role of Monarchs in the middle ages?
    8·2 answers
  • Why did the British government give in to colonial resistance toward the Stamp Act? Select the best answer from the choices prov
    14·1 answer
  • At the end of the world war 1, president wilson offended members of the us senate by
    7·1 answer
  • Who were carpetbaggers and what was their purpose? <br><br>please help :)​
    7·2 answers
  • 4. Who aside from the Spanish Crown helped fund Columbus' voyage?
    12·2 answers
  • I need to sort these out please help
    10·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast the north and the south In history?​
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!