Based on the graph, the slope is -3, and the y-intercept is 1. So your equation should be:
y = -3x + 1
The answer is C
y + 2 = -3(x - 1)
y + 2 = -3x + 3
y = -3x + 1
Answer:
∠ XAZ = 50°
Step-by-step explanation:
The measure of the circle = 360°
Given arc XYZ = 230°, then
arc XZ = 360° - 230° = 130°
The tangent- tangent angle XAZ is one half the difference of the intercepted arcs, that is
∠ XAZ =
(230 - 130)° = 0.5 × 100° = 50°
An adverb is a word that describes a verb.
Example: The eagle flew swiftly to catch its prey. In this case, the word "swiftly" describes the verb "flew", making it the adverb.
Sentence A does not contain an adverb.
Sentence B does not contain an adverb.
Sentence C contains an adverb. The word "carefully" describes the verb "checked".
Sentence D contains an adverb. The word "deeply" describes the verb "worried".
Sentence E does not contain an adverb.
Answer:x = -8
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)