Answer:
The mode is pepperoni. This data set isn't numerical.
Step-by-step explanation:
The data set is skewed right.
Answer:
D. y=4x
Step-by-step explanation:
It asks for a proportional relationship between x and y
And is the only answer
because
When x and y is 1 the answer is
4/1
And when x and y is 2 the answer is
8/2
If you divide both of them are still 4
And this will always be the result no matter how many times you do it
like if you put it as 150
150 times 4 is 600/150
600 divided by 150 is 4
Hope this helps!
Answer:
k=-j=15
Step-by-step explanation:
See attachment for step by step :)
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol
which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.
A ratio that is equivalent to 8/3 is 16/6.
Because:- 8*2= 16
3*2=6
16/6 is equivalent to 8/3
Writing a proportion:-
8/3=16/6