The answer should be (6,-1)
Explanation:
Focus on point A since it's asking for that. Then, shift it down vertically -8.
This means you are shifting A down 8 units.
Then they ask for a reflection across the y-axis. The y-axis is the vertical line in the middle, so to do this transformation, just change the x-value of where A is to the opposite.
*Given
Money of Phoebe - 3 times as much as Andy
Money of Andy - 2 times as much as Polly
Total money of Phoebe, - <span>£270
</span> Andy and Polly
*Solution
Let
B - Phoebe's money
A - Andy's money
L - Polly's money
1. The money of the Phoebe, Andy, and Polly, when added together would total <span>£270. Thus,
</span>
B + A + L = <span>£270 (EQUATION 1)
2. Phoebe has three times as much money as Andy and this is expressed as
B = 3A
3. Andy has twice as much money as Polly and this is expressed as
A = 2L</span> (EQUATION 2)
<span>
4. This means that Phoebe has ____ as much money as Polly,
B = 3A
B = 3 x (2L)
B = 6L </span>(EQUATION 3)<span>
This step allows us to eliminate the variables B and A in EQUATION 1 by expressing the equation in terms of Polly's money only.
5. Substituting B with 6L, and A with 2L, EQUATION 1 becomes,
6L + 2L + L = </span><span>£270
</span> 9L = <span>£270
</span> L = <span>£30
So, Polly has </span><span>£30.
6. Substituting L into EQUATIONS 2 and 3 would give us the values for Andy's money and Phoebe's money, respectively.
</span>
A = 2L
A = 2(£30)
A = £60
Andy has £60
B = 6L
B = 6(£30)
B = £180
Phoebe has £180
Therefore, Polly's money is £30, Andy's is £60, and Phoebe's is £180.
6 *20 = 120
8 *60 = 480
120 + 480 = 600 pounds total
Answer:
The first table represents a function.
Step-by-step explanation:
For it to be a function, there needs to be 1 unique y value of 1 unique x value.
- Looking at 2nd table, we see x value of -5 is mapped to 2 different y values of -5 and 5. So this is not a function.
- Looking at 3rd table, we see x value of -2 is mapped to 2 different y values of 2 and 4. So this is not a function.
- Looking at 4th table, we see x value of -4 is mapped to 2 different y values of 2 and 0. So this is not a function as well.
Looking at table 1, there are no duplicate x values and each of the 4 x values map to different values. So the first table represents a function.
First, we must express the ratio of rent to Joel's total earning. 375 out of 1500 in its simplest form is 1/4. To express a value in percentage, we must multiply it to 100. Thus, for this case, we have
1/4 x 100 = 25%
That means, out of a total of 100%, Joel spends 25%<span>of his income on rent.</span>