All categories

2 years ago

laurette has 126 cards. She buys 6 more packages of cards that each have 7 cards in them. How many cards does laurette have now?

Mathematics

1 answer:

ANTONII [103]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

168

Step-by-step explanation: 6 times 7 equals 42. Add 42 to 126 and Laurette has a total of 168 cards now.

You might be interested in

What is the value of five in 3156

slava [35]

Answer:

Hey there!

The five is located in the tens place, so the value would be 5(10), or 50.

Let me know if this helps :)

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Chad bought 7 pounds of strawberries for $10.80. What was the cost, c, of 1 pound of strawberries?

never [62]

If you divide the price (10.80) by the weight (7lbs) you would get 1.54 per lbs

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

This Dot Plot shows how many books a selection of students read during

leva [86]

Answer: A

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

For the function f(x) = 7/2x-16, what is the difference quotient for all nonzero values of h?

sergey [27]

Answer:

$\frac{f(x + h) - f(x)}{ h} = \frac{7}{2}$

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

$f(x) = \frac{7}{2}x - 16$

Required

The difference quotient for h

The difference quotient is calculated as:

$\frac{f(x + h) - f(x)}{ h}$

Calculate f(x + h)

$f(x) = \frac{7}{2}x - 16$

$f(x+h) = \frac{7}{2}(x+h) - 16$

$f(x+h) = \frac{7}{2}x+ \frac{7}{2}h- 16$

The numerator of $\frac{f(x + h) - f(x)}{ h}$ is:

$f(x + h) - f(x) = \frac{7}{2}x+ \frac{7}{2}h- 16 -(\frac{7}{2}x - 16)$

$f(x + h) - f(x) = \frac{7}{2}x+ \frac{7}{2}h- 16 -\frac{7}{2}x + 16$

Collect like terms

$f(x + h) - f(x) = \frac{7}{2}x -\frac{7}{2}x + \frac{7}{2}h- 16 + 16$

$f(x + h) - f(x) = \frac{7}{2}h$

So, we have:

$\frac{f(x + h) - f(x)}{ h} = \frac{7}{2}h \div h$

Rewrite as:

$\frac{f(x + h) - f(x)}{ h} = \frac{7}{2}h * \frac{1}{h}$

$\frac{f(x + h) - f(x)}{ h} = \frac{7}{2}$

5 0

2 years ago

Assigned newbits with the opposite values of oldbits if flipbits is true. ex: if oldbits = [1, 1, 0, 1] and flipbits is 1, then

Kisachek [45]

Franck's answer is better (using ~), but I just wanted to point out that the conditional in yours is slightly redundant. It's easy to forget that, since you already have a boolean value, you don't need to perform a comparison in your conditional. So you could have just done this...

<span>if x x = false; else x = true; <span>end</span></span>

5 0

2 years ago