We can solve it two ways, we´ll do it via physics:
We know that:
d=vt
d=770km/h*15h
d=11550km
Now at 660km/h:
t=d/v
t=11550km/660km/h
t=17,5h
Math way:
770km/h→15h
660km/h→x
So:
(770*15)/660=x
x=17,5h
Answer:
5.184 or 5.180 (rounded up)
Step-by-step explanation:
V = Bh or l x w x h
2.4 x 1.2 x 1.8 = 5.184 but rounded up would be 5.180
10 mm = 1 cm, so
630 mm = 63 cm, so
64 cm is greater
Answer:
Correlation coefficient 'r' would be lower.
Step-by-step explanation:
Correlation is co movement relationship between two variables.
Correlation coefficient 'r' is positive, when variables move in same direction. 'r' is negative when variables move in opposite direction. So, 'r' lies between -1 (perfect negative correlation) & +1 (perfect positive correlation). High 'r' magnitude reflects strong correlation between the variables, Low 'r' reflects weak weak correlation between the variables.
Correlation studied between amount of daily exercise and weight : It is negative as exercise & weight are negatively correlated - more exercise, less weight & less exercise, more weight. 'r' is given = -0.21
If sample is restricted to people weighing less than 180 pounds : It would lead to fall in 'r'. Such because these low weight people are likely to have good natural metabolic rate, naturally slim body physique / figure. So, in their case, exercise & body weight are likely to be less (weakly) correlated than normal case.
With respect to where theta.
CW is hypotenuse
WO is opposite leg
CO is adjacent leg
