Answer: redesign its products to eliminate those features that might have market appeal, but would excessively increase production costs.
Explanation:
The main aim of every organization are typically cost minimization and profit maximization. If I wanted to advise a company on the kind of actions to take to perform value chain activities more cost effectively, I'll tell them to improve their supply chain efficiency as well as use economies of scale and effective utilization of its resources.
Therefore, redesigning its products to eliminate those features that might have market appeal, but would excessively increase production costs is wrong as this will only lead to increase in cost.
Answer:
$12,600
Explanation:
Particulars Amount
a. Issue common stock for cash $40,000
b. Purchase building and land with cash, -$25,000
c. Provide services to customers on account $6,000
d. Pay utilities on building -$500
e. Collect $4,000 on account from customers $4,000
f. Pay employee salaries -$8,000
g. Pay dividends to stockholders -<u>$3,900</u>
Net Cash Flow <u>$12,600</u>
The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) for ABC Limited is 12.63%
The weighted average cost of capital(WACC) of a firm is the average cost of finance incurred by the firm on all its sources of finance.
It is determined as the sum of the cost of each source of finance multiplied by their respective weights in the firm's capital structure.
By weights, I mean the percentage of funding each source contributes to the total finance available at the firm's disposal.
WACC=(weight of equity*cost of equity)+(weight of mezzanine finance*cost of mezzanine finance)+(weight of debt*cost of debt)
weight of equity=equity finance/total finance
cost of equity=15%
weight of mezzanine finance=mezzanine finance/total finance
cost of mezzanine finance=9.5%
weight of debt of finance=debt finance/total finance
total finance=$5m+$2m+$1m
total finance=$8m
WACC=($5/$8*15%)+($2/$8*9.5%)+($1/$8*7%)
WACC=12.63%
Find further guidance on weighted average cost of capital's computation in the link below:
brainly.com/question/25566972
#SPJ1
Answer:
a) signing the most lucrative contract you can upon graduation
Explanation:
A best professional should be deal with a person who earned from their professional activity. It is always be in benefit of a public interest and the society at a whole
Here in the given situation, the option B, C and D denotes the best professional but option A is not a factor as you cant get the lucrative contract when you are on graduation level
Therefore the same is to be considered
Answer with explanation:
It is better for companies to offer a mixture of compensation programs instead of only one since it attracts a major number of competent workers. Some employees might be very selective at the time of choosing a job according to the benefits they could receive. For instance, a high executive could prefer to start working in an "A" firm since they organization offers an attractive number of stock shares per year as part of the compensation program instead of working for firm "B" that is not even publicly listed.
