Something that you might in a Paleolithic cave is cave paintings
The ultimate goal of Hinduism is the achievement of moksha
Is it true. The American Poetry suffers some change too, according to some new poets appeared in the sixties. That was when a Poet called Robert Bly changed the name of his magazine called “The Fifties” to “The Sixties”. This literary magazine used to publish criticism about the old and new poets, most of the Editorials by Robert Bly himself.
With this, even Walt Whitman, one of the most acclaimed North American poets of the late 18th century, was criticized. Walt Whitman was one of the first to break the British poetry style, in which metrics and rhymes were strict. After he came out, other poets with different proposals, including Olson, who suggested the theory of "breathing," poetry more faithful to subjective feelings by putting pauses and breaks in words, which suggested moments of breathing to the declaimers. Williams and Pound were other poets who suggested before the 1960s poetry focused on economy, liveliness, and that it would be instantaneous. This group of poets was called "Imagists". Robert Bly called this the poetry of figures, ridiculing.
According to him, their poetry was superficial. However, he himself used images to create his poetry, which he said communicated inner psychic events. In this way, his poetry approached the previous ones but with more freedom of creation and using surrealism.
American did
Is your answer
The Supreme Court was affirming the point that states (not the federal government) should be in charge of the voting procedures in their states.The Supreme Court decision you're referring to, which invalidated pre-clearance conditions, was Shelby County v. Holder (2013). "Pre-clearance" meant that certain states, according to the Voting Rights Acts of 1965, had to get approval in advance from federal authorities for any changes they made to their state regulations regarding voting. That standard had been applied to several states because they had displayed discriminatory practice in their voting laws. The decision in Shelby County v. Holder held that the federal government could not keep applying that requirement on the basis of decades-old data.
I recently posted another answer on Shelby County v. Holder, which you can check out too. Read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/9069264#readmore
