1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mote1985 [20]
3 years ago
14

which of the following phrases from the Declaration of Independence emphasizes the importance of natural rights?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Kisachek [45]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

- "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal..."

Explanation:

The phrase 'we hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal' outlines the significance of natural rights. The <u>use of words 'self-evident' shows that equality is a natural and universal law produced by the almighty that does not need to be dependent or backed by any legal law created by humans</u>. The declaration characterizes every man being generated equal as an inalienable law given by God and can never be withdrawn by humans. Thus, the above phrase highlights their importance.

You might be interested in
Personality development is ________.
Mandarinka [93]

Personality development is a<u> methodology for </u><u>strengthening</u><u> and </u><u>growing </u><u>one's personality</u>.

Personality is nothing more than the culmination of all of an individual's memories and life experiences. An individual's personality is also influenced by environmental variables, family history, socioeconomic situation, genetic traits and other circumstances. Additionally, personality affects our thoughts, beliefs, values and expectations. Our personality affects how we view other people.

An individual can cultivate their personality to help them feel confident and highly valued. This is known as personality development. One's communication abilities and worldview are thought to benefit from this as well. Due to personality development, people frequently acquire a positive outlook.

To know more about personality see:

brainly.com/question/17636115

#SPJ4

3 0
10 months ago
Analyze the map below and answer the question that follows.
docker41 [41]

Answer:

A.) 4

Explanation:

I think it's referring to how many are on the map and I counted for, hope that helps.

7 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP A major development in relations between the Soviet Union and the United States occurred in the late 1980’s when the
White raven [17]

Answer:

About the author

Rebecca Johnson

Rebecca Johnson is Executive Director of the Acronym Institute for Disarmament Diplomacy.

Established upon the ashes of the Second World War to represent “We the Peoples”, it is not surprising that both peace and security were fundamental objectives for the United Nations. While many also wanted disarmament, countervailing lessons were drawn by some political leaders, which made it difficult to get multilateral agreements on disarmament for several decades. Debates around nuclear weapons epitomized and sharpened the challenges. Academics in the United States of America led in developing theories of deterrence to provide legitimacy for these weapons of mass destruction, which soon became embedded in the military doctrines and political rhetoric of further Governments, from NATO allies to the Eastern bloc and beyond. Deterrence theory sought to invert the normative relationship between peace and disarmament by arguing that nuclear weapons were actually peacekeepers amassed to deter aggressors rather than to fight them. From there it became a short step for some countries—including permanent Members of the Security Council of the United Nations—to promote ideologies that equated security and peace with high “defence” budgets and military-industrial dependence on arms manufacture and trade. This is the backdrop for understanding how the United Nations System and disarmament approaches have intersected since 1945, and the way in which reframing disarmament as a universal humanitarian imperative has opened more productive opportunities for future multilateral disarmament treaties.

The very first resolution of the General Assembly of the United Nations, in January 1946, addressed the “problems raised by the discovery of atomic energy”. Despite civil society’s efforts, led by scientists and women’s peace organizations, leaders of the United States and the Soviet Union rejected measures to curb nuclear ambitions. As the cold war took hold, the leaders that had emerged “victorious” in 1945 raced each other to manufacture and deploy all kinds of new weapons and war technologies, especially nuclear, chemical and biological weapons (notwithstanding the 1925 Geneva Protocol prohibiting the use of chemical and biological weapons in war) and a variety of missiles to deliver them speedily anywhere in the world.

After early efforts to control nuclear developments floundered, it was the upsurge of health and environmental concerns provoked by nuclear testing that led the Prime Minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru, and the Japanese Parliament to call for such explosions to be halted altogether. After an egregiously irresponsible 15 megaton thermonuclear bomb was tested in the Marshall Islands on 1 March 1954, Nehru submitted his proposal for a Comprehensive Nuclear-Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) to the United Nations Disarmament Commission on 29 July 1954. Since then CTBT has been the centrepiece of disarmament demands from many States, especially the developing countries of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM). Intended as a first step towards disarmament, the driving force behind CTBT was concern about the humanitarian impacts. Early attempts at multilateral negotiations through a newly created Ten-Nation Committee on Disarmament made little progress. Although the leaders of the United States, the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom professed their desire for a CTBT, their talks kept stalling. Obstacles from the nuclear laboratories and security advisors were dressed up as verification problems, but they stemmed from these nuclear-armed Governments’ military ambitions and rivalries, and their shared determination to keep their own weapons options open, even as they sought to limit those of others.

From 1959 to 1961, various resolutions were adopted by the General Assembly aimed at preventing the testing, acquisition, use, deployment and proliferation of nuclear weapons. In 1961, for example, General Assembly resolution 1664 (XVI) recognized that “the countries not possessing nuclear weapons have a grave interest, and an important part to fulfil” in halting nuclear tests and achieving nuclear disarmament. General Assembly resolution 1653 (XVI) went further, noting that the targets of nuclear weapons would not just be “enemies” but “peoples of the world not involved in…war”, with devastation that would “exceed even the scope of war and cause indiscriminate suffering and destruction to mankind…contrary to the rules of international law and to the laws of humanity”. And finally, General Assembly resolution 1665 (XVI), unanimously adopted, called on nuclear and non-nuclear weapons possessors to “cooperate” to prevent further acquisition and spread of nuclear weapons. These early resolutions fed into “non-proliferation” talks between the United States, the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom, viewed as first steps towards disarmament.

4 0
3 years ago
A widely circulated story that the pope endorsed Donald Trump for president in 2016 was a good example of
liubo4ka [24]

Answer:

fake news

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Is modern feminism harming or bettering society?​
vesna_86 [32]

Answer:

Yes it is

Explanation:

BECAUSE OF YOU

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Compare the emergence of advanced civilizations in Meso and South America with the four early river valley civilizations.
    7·1 answer
  • The use of scientific methods to explore people's satisfaction with the past, happiness with the present, and optimism about the
    14·1 answer
  • What are some examples of slogans for Georgia's piedmont?
    13·1 answer
  • How does the right of association extend the right of assembly
    15·1 answer
  • What was significant about the joining of the two kingdoms under narmer?
    15·2 answers
  • I lowkey suck at science please help!
    6·1 answer
  • Sixteen-year-old yung sun has been dating marcus for two months. she believes that no one has ever been in love as much as she i
    15·1 answer
  • Why is school regarded as secondary means of socialization?​
    9·1 answer
  • Anyone up for some fun ? i am bóréd​
    9·1 answer
  • The United States has a capitalist ____ economy in which people are free to make economic choices.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!