The answer to the question how many direct labor hours were estimated for the year is letter B which is 180,000.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
Answer:
C. lower, higher
The reason for this is that when growth rates are lower investors will be willing to pay less for the stock is because low growth rate mean that the capital gains will be less as stock price is less likely to increase in the future and dividend growth is also less. Also the DDM model D*(1+G)/1-R shows that mathematically a lower growth rate would mean lower stock price
Also Higher required returns mean that the investor requires higher returns to buy the stock, because he may view the stock as risky and requires higher returns for the risk he is taking or he may have a higher opportunity cost (for eg interest rates may be high) with other investments. Mathematically the DDM model D*(1+G)/R-G shows us that a higher R would mean lower stock price.
Explanation:
Answer:
8.54%
Explanation:
Current Index value:
= [current total market value of index stocks] ÷ [Base year total market value of index stocks] × Base year index value
= [(69 × 35000) + (122 × 32500)] ÷ [(63 × 35000) + (113 × 32500)] × 100
= 108.54
Return in percent:
= ( 108.54 - 100 ) ÷ 100
= 8.54%
Therefore, the value-weighted return for the index is 8.54%.
Answer:
Steak is a normal good, and hamburger is an inferior good for Jennie
Explanation:
Based on this behavior, we can assume steak is a normal good, and hamburger is an inferior good for Jennie. That is because a normal good is any good who's demand increases when there is a rise in the consumers' income, while an inferior good sees decreased demand due to a rise in income. Therefore, since Jenna buys more (increased demand) steak and less (decreased demand) hamburger due to her increased income this means that steak is a normal good, and hamburger is an inferior good for Jennie
Answer:
$ 102,100
Explanation:
Based on the scenario been described in the question the incremental Analysis for replacement of old equipment:
Cost of New used lift
$ 190,500
Saving in Incremental Cost of Repair of old lift
$ (45,000)
Reduction in Annual operating expenses = $25,600 * 6 years
$ (153,600)
Annual Rent revenue from new used lift = $11,000*6 years
$ (66,000)
Sale price of old lift
$ (28,000)
Saving in Incremental Costs
$ (102,100)
Net income increase
$ 102,100
Hence, the net income shall increase by $102,100 if the old liftis replaced.
