Hi!
A reasonable right to pricacy can be expected if<u> refusing to testify against oneself in court</u>.
<u>According to the </u><u>fifth</u><u> ammendment</u>, we all have the right to protect ourselves agaisnt self-incimination. This is the people have to not testify agaisnt themselves. Therefore, if the government feels like you should be investigated, the state must prove its case without the help of the defendant. This also applies when an a defendant refuses to talk to the police, however, such defendant cannot refuse to appear before the grand jury.
Answer:
Problem focused coping
Explanation:
Problem focused coping is the coping type of solving the problem.
Hope it helped!
Answer:
b. informational social influence
Explanation:
Informational social influence is a psychological or social phenomenon that describes the tendency of an individual to accept the information of others we consider accurate and correct most especially when faced with ambiguity or obscurity. We simply conform to the opinions of others we believe have an accurate information we seem not to have. In such situation, we simply conform to what they are doing because we believe they are right.
When participants in an experiment conform to others' answers as explained in the scenario given in the question, we can infer that it best illustrates the <em>impact of informational social influence</em> rather than influence from peers.
I believe that is comprehensive, since you're trying to understand all people as a whole.