This question is incomplete
Complete Question
In the first half of a basketball game, a player scored 9 points on free throws and then scored a number of 2-point shots. In the second half, the player scored the same number of 3-point shots as the number of 2-point shots scored in the first half. Which expression represents the total number of points the player scored in the game?
a) 2x + 3x + 9
b) 2x + 3 + 9
c) 2x + 3x + 9x
d) 2 + 3x + 9
Answer:
a) 2x + 3x + 9
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the number of points shots a player scores = x
In a free throw, the player scored 9 points = 9
The player also scored a number of 2-point shots = 2x
In the second half, the player scored the same number of 3-point shots as the number of 2-point shots scored in the first half = 3x
The expression represents the total number of points the player scored in the game =
2x + 3x + 9
Answer:
y=-1x-1
Step-by-step explanation:
it should be this
Brainliest please
You would subtract 18 over so you have negative -14 equals -e or 14 equals e
Answer:
Where (a) is the side length of the hypercube
Step-by-step explanation:
A dimension can be simply defined as a direction in which matter can move it.
We live in a 3-dimensional world, matter can move in three basic directions. The formula for finding the volume of a cube is the following: (
). In the second dimension, a flat world, the area for the volume of a square is as follows: (
). However, a hypercube is a paradox, as it exists in 4-dimensions, thus it cannot exist in our world. However, scientists propose "String theory" which requires that matter can move in more directs than the (3) we know of in our world. In essence, there can be more than 3 dimensions. A hypercube is the 4-dimensional version of a cube. If it follows the area pattern that a square-object follows in all preceding dimensions then the area of a hypercube is ().
Bear in mind that the area patter for a square-object is generally the following:
Where (a) is the side length of the square-object
(n) is the dimension the object is in.
Please keep in mind, this answer was written in the June of 2021, as science keeps progressing and new discoveries are made, this theory can be disproven. Therefore, this answer might be considered correct now, but it can be proven incorrect in the future.
