Answer:
B) 20.6 mi/hr
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve this, we need to first convert 40 meters to mile, then convert 4.35 seconds to hour, then solve by proportion.
converting 40 meters to mile;
1 mile = 1609.344 meter
x = 40 meters
1609.344x = 40
x = 40/1609.344
x =0.02485 mile
Then converting seconds to hour
1 hour = 3600 seconds
y = 4.35 seconds
3600 y = 4.35
y=4.35/3600
y =0.00121 hour
Using proportion to solve the question
Let n be the number he runs miles per hour
0.02485 mile = 0.00121 hour
n = 1 hour
cross-multiply
0.00121 n = 0.02485
Divide both-side by 0.00121
0.00121 n/0.00121 = 0.02485/0.00121
n ≈ 20.6 mile/hour
Therefore, he is running 20.6 mi/hr
265/5 = 53/1
53 miles per hour.
*I hope this helped!
F(x)=3x+1 (preimage)
g(x)=x+1 (image)
it is undergoing a reduction/compression with translation.
In general, a linear transformation is
g(x) = a*f(bx-h)+k
h=horizontal translation (right if h>0, left if h<0, note formula has minus sign)
k=vertical translation (up if k>0, down if k<0)
a=vertical stretching, (stretching if |a|>1, compression if |a|<1, also, if a<0, a reflection across the x-axis is performed)
b=horizontal stretching (|b|>0 compression, |b|<0 stretching, also, if b<0, a reflection across the y-axis is performed)
In this case,
g(x)=f(x/3), so it is a horizontal stretching.
Note that the y-intercept remains unchanged.
Answer:
C) The mean is about 100.
Step-by-step explanation:
We see that the best fit line (out of the options listed) would be y=100. The mean can also be algebraically calculated with the following equation:
Let 
be the mean (average) of the values:
, which is closest to answer choice C) The mean is about 100.
