Answer:
$600
Explanation:
If instead of itemizing, Mary had elected the standard deduction last year, then she wouldn't have to include any state income tax refund on her current gross income. But since she itemized her deductions and actually deducted these $600 from her gross income last year, she must include them in he current gross income.
Answer:
$550,000
Explanation:
Based on the information given the OPPORTUNITY COST OF RUNNING THE HARDWARE STORE will be $550,000 ($500,000+$50,000), which include the amount of $500,000 which is the cost of renting the store as well as to the cost to buy the stock while the $50,000 is her salary as an Accountant, reason been that she would QUIT HER JOB as an accountant in order for her to run the store.
Therefore the OPPORTUNITY COST will be $550,000
Answer:
Maximum profit = $6
Maximum loss = -$2
Explanation:
The computation of maximum profit and loss for this position is shown below:-
Maximum profit = Strike price - Purchase of stock
= $58 - $52
= $6
Maximum loss = Strike price - Purchase of stock
= $50 - $52
= - $2
Therefore for determining the maximum profit and loss for this position we simply applied the above formulas.
Answer:
An contract is an understanding agreement that can be implemented in court it is a shaped by two or more gatherings who consent to perform or to cease from playing out some demonstration now or later on . The target hypothesis of agreements not by the individual or subjective aim or conviction of a gathering .The hypothesis is that gathering's expectation to go into an agreement is judged by outward destinations truths as deciphered by a sensible individual ,as opposed to by the gathering's mystery subjective aims . the essential components of a substantial contract and the path in which an agreement is made. The agreements that fall under this circumstance would be the agreement of arrangement contract of development ,contract of execution and the agreement of enforceability. The main contract would be the agreement of arrangement .They are contracts that are grouped in light of how when an agreement of development .
In the event that Ed had constantly paid for all the earlier pieces of candy, there gives off an impression of being suggested in actuality contract taking into account the earlier course of dealings amongst Ed and Fran.
Waving the sweet treat at Fran can be seen as an affirmation that Ed was not surreptitiously taking the piece of candy, but rather was demonstrating that he would get her the cash for that one later. His questionable signal in light of the gatherings earlier course of managing could sensibly be translated by Fran as a nonverbal IOU at the cost of that 1 piece of candy.There can likewise be an inferred in law contract taking into account the same certainties since to not force a suggested in law guarantee to pay results in the uncalled for improvement of Ed at the expense of Fran.Either sort of inferred contract is enforceable in Court.
Answer:
$20,000 ordinary gain
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Cash proceeds from Selling of the equipment = $50,000
Purchasing cost of the equipment = $60,000
Depreciation expense = $30,000
Now,
The book value of the equipment
= Purchasing cost of the equipment - Depreciation expense
= $60,000 - $30,000
= $30,000
Since,
the amount of proceeds from sales is higher than the book value of the equipment
Therefore a gain will be recognized
The amount of Gain = proceeds from Selling - book value
= $50,000 - $30,000
= $20,000
Hence,
$20,000 ordinary gain
