Answer:
D1 = $3.50
D2 = $3.50
D3 = $3.50
Ke = 10% = 0.1
Po = <u>D1</u> + <u>D2</u> + <u>D3
</u>
(1+ke) (1+ke)2 (1+ke)3
Po = <u>$3.50</u> + <u>$3.50</u> + <u>$3.50
</u>
(1+0.1) (1+0.1)2 (1+0.1)3
Po = $3.18 + $2.89 + $2.63
Po = $8.70
None of the above
Explanation:
In this scenario, we need to discount the dividend in each year by the required at rate of return of 10%. The aggregate of the price obtained as a result of discounting in year 1 to year 3 gives the current market price.
Answer:
1-a.
in order to determine the present value of option a we can look for the PVIFA (annuity factor) for 24% / 12 = 2% monthly rate and 25 payments.
PVIFA = 19.523
Present value of the 25 payments = $540 x 19.523 = $10,542.42
+
Present value of final payment = $10,000 / (1 + 24%)²⁵/¹² = $6,388.10
PV = $16,930.52
Present value of option b = $16,638
1-b.
- b. option b (lower present value)
Answer:
Crimson may not be able to deduct any of the cost incurred. In other words these expenses are inadmissible.
Explanation:
As per scenario given in the above question, Crimson Inc., may not be able to deduct any cost which is incurred related to the entertainment expenses because many changes has been made in the tax cuts and Jobs act,2017. These changes does not allowed deduction of the entertainment and business meals expenses.
In the year 2018, the entertainment expenses could not be deducted according to the tax laws applicable on the companies. Thus, the costs will not be deducted.
The reason principled negotiation would be the most suitable strategy in international trade negotiation is because it helps a party to leverage his/her principles of the opponent to win the negotiation.
The principled type of negotiation is recognized as an interest-based class of negotiation.
- A principled negotiation is known as a winner-take-all style of negotiation that is focused on a specific goal of winning.
- In a principled type of negotiation, there are no space for consideration of other party’s needs and requirements.
- However, a principled negotiations is limited because it can fail to settle dispute or conflict even if a parties has the highest intentions and negotiating skills.
In conclusion, the reason principled negotiation would be the most suitable strategy in international trade negotiation is because it helps a party to leverage his/her principles of the opponent to win the negotiation.
Read more about principled negotiation
<em>brainly.com/question/6106694</em>
