Answer:
A and B
Step-by-step explanation:
- 3/5 is less than -1/5 because it is farther away from 0 on a number line (also, when it comes to figure out which inequality is true with negative number, the smaller one is going to be greater because it is closer to 0 on a number line)
3/5 is greater than 1/5 because they are both positive and 3/5 is the bigger number
-1/5 is not less than -3/5 because if A is true, than this cannot be true because it is saying the exact opposite.
Answer: I think 13
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Average = 96
Step-by-step explanation:
Average = sum of terms/ number of terms
sum of terms = number of burgers sold
number of terms = number of visitors
d = number of days since Monday which is 7
burgers sold = 200d^3 + 542d^2 + 179d + 1605 substituting d with 7
burgers sold = 200(7)³ +542(7)² + 179(7) +1605
burgers sold =68600 + 26558 + 1253 + 1605
burgers sold =98016
number of visitors= 100d + 321
number of visitors= 100(7) + 321
number of visitors= 700+321
number of visitors= 1021
Average = 98016/1021
Average = 96
Answer:
10 weeks
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's set an equation for you and your brother.
You have $90 plus $18 for every week you save (x).
90+18x
And your brother has $120 plus $15 dollars per week that he saves (x)
120+15x
You want to have the sum of the money equal so combine the two concluded statements
90+18x=120+15x
Arrange them so that you have like terms on each side
90+18x-15x=12+15x-15x
90+3x=120
90-90+3x=120-90
3x=30
x=10
"x" is our number of weeks you and your brother save so the answer is 10 weeks
Just to be sure you can use our equation and plug 10 for every time you see x to make sure our answer is right.
Answer:
The answer is "Principal of marginal analysis".
Step-by-step explanation:
To determine unless the benefits of even an aggressive resource would outweigh its costs, and therefore increase utility, individuals and businesses can use a valuation model to compare the risks versus the benefits of more activities, like whether to create or consuming more. It's the amount during which net value is greater than or equal to marginal cost that's the optimal quantity in this situation. The amount where the marginal social cost curve and consumer surplus line connect.
