Answer:
"Why We've Been Hugely Underestimating the Overfishing of the Oceans"
Determining whether each statement is true or false:
a. False
b. True
c. False
d. True
Explanation:
The article "Why We've Been Hugely Underestimating the Overfishing of the Oceans," was published by the Washington Post on January 19, 2016. It was written by Chelsea Harvey. It tried to show how the world fish stock had been declining due to overfishing. This is why it provided a report contrary to the FAO report.
While the FAO report noted that the peak of worldwide catches was at 86 million tons in 1996, the contrary and independent report, using "catch reconstruction" showed that the peak was at 130 million tons in 1996. The reconstructed research also showed that worldwide fish catches had suffered declines ever since the 1996 peak, thereby threatening "world food security and marine ecosystems". The contrary report also suggested that all stakeholders must collaborate so that fish stocks can rebuild naturally.
Answer:
The answer is b. Advocacy research
Explanation:
Advocacy research is carried out with the intention of providing evidence and arguments that can be used to support a particular cause or position.
The marginal benefit from the activity is equal to the marginal cost
Answer:
time period
Explanation:
In accounting, the time period principle states that a firm must report its financial statements for specific periods of time. For example, the Securities and exchange Commission (SEC) requires public corporations to submit their financial reports every quarter. This is done in order for accounting periods to be comparable, e.g. comparing a quarterly report vs an annual report is not correct.