A viable argument showing how it is reflected by the Cost Function for Wichita’s factory is; The cost of production per unit of item produced is 1$ as long as total units produced is less than 2500. If more than 2500 units are produced than the cost per unit actually comes down to 0.8$per unit.
<h3>How to Interpret Cost Functions?</h3>
From the given options, the best statement is;
The plant’s production processes are performed primarily by robots that are able to work longer hours, when needed, at no additional cost.
A cost function is a formula used to predict the cost that will be experienced at a certain activity level. Thus, the cost function for the best option is;
The cost of production per unit of item produced is 1$ as long as total units produced is less than 2500. If more than 2500 units are produced than the cost per unit actually comes down to 0.8$per unit.
The missing options are;
___ The electricity contract with the utility company is structured so that higher daily energy usage is charged at a lower rate.
___ The plant’s production processes are performed primarily by robots that are able to work longer hours, when needed, at no additional cost.
___ Overtime wages were required to produce at levels above 25,000 units.
Read more about Cost Functions at; brainly.com/question/14038368
#SPJ1
ANSWER
b>1
EXPLANATION
The given inequality is;
2 (b - 4) > -6
Expand the parenthesis to get,
2b-8>-6
2b>-6+8
Simplify the right hand side.
2b>2
Divide both sides by:
b>1
<span>Carl has 3 bags in total. One backpack weighs 4 kg and the rest two checking bags have the equal weight. The total weight of 3 bags is given to be 35 kg.
Let the weight of each checking bag is w kg. So we can write:
2 x (Weight of a checking bag) + Weight of Backpack = 35
Using the values, we get:
2w+ 4 = 35
Using this equation we can find the weight of each checking bag, as shown below.
2w = 31
w = 31/2
w = 15.5
Thus, the weight of each checking bag is 15.5 kg
</span>
