Because the strength of the gravitational forces between two objects
depends on the distance between the objects' centers, and when your
elevation changes, so does the distance between your center and the
center of the Earth.
Hello My Dear Friend!Do you mean
Sun or actually Moon?If Moon is what you're looking for...then that is
absolutely IMPOSSIBLE, due to that the Earth is WAY bigger than the Moon, therefore, not even HALF of the Earth would fit into the Moon since it's too small XD.But if it's
Sun...well then, t<span>he Answer is that it would take </span>
1.3 million Earths<span>
to fill up the Sun. That's a lot of Earths LOL XD</span>
I Hope my answer has come to your Help. Thank you for posting your question here in
We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon.
Have a nice day ahead! :)
The new electrostatic force will be 384 units.
The electrostatic force of attraction between two charges (charge of object 1) and (charge of object 2) separated by a distance d is given by
is the permittivity of free space.
Initially, we have,
Now, if the charge of object 1 is multiplied by 1, the charge of object 2 is multiplied by 3, and the distance separating objects 1 and 2 is divided by 4, we have, .
The new electrostatic force will be,
units.
We have,
Hence,
Hence, the new electrostatic force will be 384 units.
To read a similar problem on electrostatic forces visithttps://brainly.com/question/16049250
<u>Answer:
</u>
4) The lost value is $4500.
5) The values in a $ are Dependent variable in the graph.
6) Time(year) is inversely proportional to the values in $.
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
4) To calculate a loss between 2005 and 2006 we will find the value on the y-axis for 2005(which is on the x-axis) from the graph and subtract it by the value on the y-axis for 2006(which is on the x-axis) from the graph.
loss between 2005 and 2006 = $14500-$10000
= $4500
Percentage of loss is 31.03%
5) A dependent variable is a variable being tried and estimated in a logical test. The dependent variable in the graph is the value of the car that is given in the Dollar($). We can see that by the increase of the time there is an effect on the value of the car and the dependent variables are taken on the y-axis.
6) From the graph, It is shown that with an increase in time(year) the value of Sarah's car decreases and with the decrease in time its value increases. So it is clear that time is inversely proportional to the value of the car. By every passing year, the value of the car decreases.
If you are stationary, but in/on a moving vehicle/object you can be at rest and moving at then same time.
<u>Explanation</u>:
- A particle, when viewed from a given frame of reference, cannot be both at rest and in motion. However, in one frame of reference, a particle can be in motion whereas in another frame of reference the particle is in motion.
- For example, if you are seated in a plane, the plane is stationary in that reference frame and the Earth moves under it, but in the reference frame of the Earth, the plane is moving concerning the Earth. When you are standing still on Earth, in your frame of reference, the Earth is stationary, and the Sun and stars move around the Earth.
- However, in the frame of reference of the center of our solar system, the Earth orbits the Sun and the Sun are perturb slightly by the rest of the planets, but the rest of the galaxy orbits our solar system. Of course, in rest from our Galaxy, our solar system orbits a giant black hole at its center.