Studying animals in the wild is considered somewhat experimentally out of control because of several reasons.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Study of wild animals can be done using several methods but none will be as effective as studying captivated animals. Using stationary cameras is a method to observe animals in the wild. The stationary nature of the camera makes it necessary for the animals to appear within the field of the camera.
This is difficult in places of low animal density. In addition to that placing camera at a longer distance to watch a larger area decreases the resolution of the images. When it comes to shallow water systems, the field imagery used to track the aquatic species frequently gets affected by issues like sun flicker.
Unmanned aerial vehicles can also be used to track and study animals in the wild. This is good alternative but filming through dense canopies or turbid water is a limitation. Bio loggers can also be used for animal tracking but it is limited by weight since it has to be carried by animals.
To scientifically answer the question using scientific reasoning, explaining generally why it makes sense that the lion population is taking longer to recover than the herbivore populations is that;
The herbivore populations have enough food in the ecosystem,this food is in the form of flora,and this food they get keep their energy flowing and also has a way of ensuring their high recovery rates.
Then looking at the lion population,on the contrary,they have to depend on feeding on smaller animals this is because the larger animals reproduce at a smaller pace, and lions with a smaller prey,lions don't get enough and adequate food/nutrition for themselves and also for their pride of lions,this ascertains the fact that lion population take a longer time to recover than it's counterparts which is the herbivores.
Answer:
Foliation
Explanation:
I just searched it. Foliation is layering in rocks, just like kit kats are layered.
