You cannot rely on the drawing alone to prove or disprove congruences. Instead, pull out the info about the sides and angles being congruent so we can make our decision.
The diagram shows that:
- Side AB = Side XY (sides with one tick mark)
- Side BC = Side YZ (sides with double tickmarks)
- Angle C = Angle Z (similar angle markers)
We have two pairs of congruent sides, and we also have a pair of congruent angles. We can't use SAS because the angles are not between the congruent sides. Instead we have SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem (recall that ambiguity is possible for SSA). The triangles may be congruent, or they may not be, we would need more information.
---------------
So to answer the question if they are congruent, I would say "not enough info". If you must go with a yes/no answer, then I would say "no, they are not congruent" simply because we cannot say they are congruent. Again we would need more information.
Answer:
wow let me try
Step-by-step explanation:it is a 90% sure
(-4, 6), (0, 2), (4, -2) are all ordered pairs that have the sum as 2.
-4+6 is the same thing as 6-4 if there's more positive than negative
0+2=2 because 0 plus a number equals to that number
4-2=2 because you're adding a negative number with the positive number together to get the answer
Just be aware that I might not make any sense at all
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
As we can see the given expression as three complex parts and all are being multiplied.
Lets simplify each part separately and then multiply all of them in the end
Part1
Cancelling 8 in numerator with 8 in denominator
Part2
simpliying
Part3
Third part is 
, and it does not need to be further simplified
Now multiplying all the three parts
So our final answer is
