Answer:
Automatic and Explicit Buffering.
In the case of explicit buffering, the length of the queue is provided while in automatic buffering the queue size needs to be indefinite. In automatic buffering there is no need to block the sender while coping the message. While in explicit buffering the sender is blocked for the space in queue.
No memory is being wasted in explicit buffering.
Send by Copy and Send by Reference.
By using the send by copy method, the receiver is not able to change the state of parameter while send by reference allow. The advantage of using the send by reference method is that it allows to change a centralized application to its distributed version.
Fixed-sized and Variable-sized Messages.
In fixed size messaging refers, the buffer size is fixed. This means only a particular number of messages can only be supported by the fixed size buffer. The drawback of the fixed size messages is that they must be a part of fixed size buffer. These are not a part of variable size buffer. The advantage of variable size message is that the length of the message is variable means not fixed. The buffer length is unknown. The shared memory is being used by the variable size messages.
Explanation:
Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Page Title</title>
</head>
<body class="YellowBackground">
<style>
.YellowBackground {
background-color:yellow;
}
</style>
</body>
</html>
Like this?
Answer:
A) True
Explanation:
Set-In-Order is part of a 5S system approach of making a workplace to be well arranged so there will be smooth operation of employees and working conditions.
Set-In-Order specifically deals with entities in the workplace apparently labeled after being well arranged in their respective places.
Hence, it is TRUE that Set-In-Order includes making changes to the layout of the area.
Answer:
Content
Design
Development
Explanation:
The design and management of sites is internet explorer; it is the research that takes place over time to make a site look fantastic, work quickly and function well with a smooth user interface.
