Via negativa hope this helps!
Answer:
The correct answer is "The fundamental attribution error".
Explanation:
The fundamental attribution error is the human tendency to emphasize personal characteristics instead of analyzing the contextual or situational explanation for other people's behavior.
<u>For example, when someone fails a test, the other students may think that their classmate failed because he is lazy or he didn't study enough and not because the questions of the test were wrongly formulated</u>.
In this particular case, the first attribution that one does to the jam is that the couple did it because they are bad communicators, only because they were arguing moments before, <u>rather than attributing the failure to get the frame to through the doorway to the possibility that it might be too big for the doorway.</u>
In conclusion, this is an example of the fundamental attribution error.
Answer:
According to thorstein veblen, a successful businessman would be most likely to demonstrate his worth to others by <u>buying expensive jewels for his trophy wife and showing her off at parties</u>.
Explanation:
Thorstein Veblen propounded the idea of "conspicuous consumption", which which implies spending money in excess or over the worth of a goods. The reason is that the aim of the rich is just to show off their wealth so as to demonstrate his worth to others.
Therefore, according to thorstein veblen, a successful businessman would be most likely to demonstrate his worth to others by<u> buying expensive jewels for his trophy wife and showing her off at parties</u>.
