1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IrinaVladis [17]
3 years ago
10

I need help please it need to be correct

Mathematics
1 answer:
Rasek [7]3 years ago
7 0
The answer is 1,816!!!!!
You might be interested in
As part of a class project, a university student surveyed the students in the cafeteria lunch line to look for a relationship be
Vedmedyk [2.9K]

Answer:

0.63

Step-by-step explanation:

To get the relative frequency of students with red hair, we need to find the relative frequency of students with red hair from the students with gray eyes.

Since we already know that the total number of students with gray eyes is 35 and the number of red hair students with gray eye is 22

The formula we will use to calculate the relative frequency will be

The relative frequency of students with red hair = Total students of red hair with gray eyes divide by total number of gray eye students

22 ÷ 35 = 0.628  ≅ 0.63

6 1
3 years ago
Ises: 1. Directions: Express in factor form a
frosja888 [35]

Answer:

10 x 10 x 10 x 10 x 10 = 100000

6 x 6 x 6 = 216

4 x 4 x 4 x 4 = 256

2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 1024 / or if the number was 21 x 0  then the answer = 1

Step-by-step explanation:

I already wrote the explanation in the answer but I'm guessing the number you put beside the first number is the exponent. So as you can see 73 = 7 mulitiplying by itself 3 times. The number 3 is an exponent because it tells you how many times you're multiplying the number by itself. If you continue doing that then you will get the same answer as I did. Good luck!

6 0
3 years ago
Josh is hiking Glacier National Park. He has now hiked a total of 17 \text{ km}17 km17, start text, space, k, m, end text and is
EastWind [94]

Answer:

The equation to determine the total length in kilometers is  \frac{h}{2} =(17+2)

The total length in kilometers of Josh’s hike is  38 km.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Let the total length in kilometers of Josh’s hike be h.

Now Given that He has now hiked a total of 17 km and is 2 km short of being 1/2 of the way done with his hike.

It means that to reach half of the length of total length Josh needs 2 more km to add in his hiking which is done which is of 17 km.

Framing the above sentence in equation form we get;

\frac{h}{2}=(17+2)

Hence, The equation to determine the total length in kilometers is  \frac{h}{2} =(17+2)

Now Solving the above equation we get;

First we will multiply 2 on both side using Multiplication property we get;

2\times \frac{h}{2}= 2\times(17+2)\\\\h =2\times 19 =38 \ km

Hence,  The total length in kilometers of Josh’s hike is  38 km.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
NEED ASAP 50 PTS FOR ANSWER
vladimir2022 [97]

Answer:

This says that the product of 3 numbers (x, x-6 and x+2) is greater than zero. In other words the product of three numbers is positive. The key to the solution is the answer to the question: "How can is it possible to get a positive result when you multiply 3 numbers?" I hope the answer is obvious to you. You get a positive result when multiplying 3 numbers when a) all 3 numbers are positive, or b) two of the numbers are negative and the third one is positive. Any other combination of 3 numbers will have a negative or zero result. So the solution to this inequality will be all the x values that make

all 3 factors positive, or

make two of the factors negative and the third one positive

Now we just have to figure out how to translate this idea into number sentences. Making this translation is easier if we take time to figure out the order of the factors, if possible. Which one is the largest? Which one is the smallest? And which one is the middle factor? Even though we do not know what value x may be, it is possible, with these 3 factors, to know the order of them. After thinking about this for a while I hope you can see that (x+2) will always be greater than the other two factors, no matter what x happens to be. Similarly (x-6) will always be less than the other two no matter what x happens to be. And that makes x the in between factor. If you have trouble seeing this:

Picture a number line.

Picture any random point on this number line. (This is our "x").

x+2 will be two units to the right of x. Being to the right makes x+2 greater than x.

x-6 will be 6 units to the left of x. Being to the left makes x-6 less than x.

With x-6 to the left and x+2 on the right, x is the in-between number.

Knowing the order of the factors, combined with some logic, will make expressing the ideas "the three factors are positive" and "two factors are negative and one is positive" easier.

"The three factors are positive"

Without using the order or any logic we could say:

x+%3E+0 and x-6+%3E+0 and x+%2B+2+%3E+0

This is not terribly difficult to solve. But if we use the order and some logic we can come up with something much easier. Think about this: If the lowest of three numbers is positive, wouldn't the other two have to be positive, too? In other words, if the lowest of three numbers is to the right of zero on the number line, wouldn't the other two numbers, which are to the right of the lowest, also be to the right of zero? I hope you can see the logic of this. So to make all three factors positive we just have to make sure the lowest one is positive:

x-6+%3E+0

"Two factors are negative and one is positive"

Without using the order or any logic we would have to describe every possible combination of two negative factors and one positive factor:

((x+%3C+0) and x+-+6+%3C+0 and x+%2B+2+%3E+0) or (x+%3C+0) and x+-+6+%3E+0 and x+%2B+2+%3C+0) or (x+%3E+0) and x+-+6+%3C+0 and x+%2B+2+%3C+0))

Yikes!! This is solvable but it will take a lot of work. But if we use the order sand some logic we can get something much simpler to solve. When we know the order of the factors, in order to have 2 of three factors negative and one of them positive we only have to make sure that the in between factor is negative and the largest factor is positive. This is so because if the in-between factor is negative then the smallest of the three would have to be negative, too. So to make two factors negative and one positive all we have to say is:

(x+%3C+0 and x+%2B+2+%3E+0)

I hope you agree that using the order and some logic makes this problem much easier to solve. When you know the order of the factors this way is much easier. (Note: if it is not possible to figure out the order of the factors, then you must use the much longer, more complicated compound inequalities.)

Remember that our solution is the set of x values that make "all three factors positive or make two factors negative and one positive". Using what we figured out above this is:

(x+-6+%3E+0) or (x+%3C+0 and x+%2B+2+%3E+0)

Now we solve this compound inequality:

(x+%3E+6) or (x+%3C+0 and x+%3E+-2)

In interval notation (x+%3E+6) is (6, infinity)

In interval notation (x+%3C+0 and x+%3E+-2) is (-2, 0)

As for "My teacher is also asking me to find the vertex, axis and symmetry.": I agree, WHAT??. Even though I think it was phrased "axis of symmetry" not "axis and symmetry" it still doesn't make sense. The words "vertex", "axis of symmetry" apply to graphs of two variable sentences (usually parabolas). But we do not have a y. And if the inequality was x%28x-6%29%28x%2B2%29+%3E+y it would simplify to x%5E3+-4x%5E2+-12x+%3C+y. This is a cubic inequality not a quadratic inequality. Its graph would not be a parabola, would not have a vertex and would not have an axis of symmetry.

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Janet is designing a frame for a client. She wants to prove to her client that m∠AGE ≅ m∠CHE in her sketch. What is the missing
Amiraneli [1.4K]

Answer:

I believe the answer is transative property. I'm currently taking the test so I'm not 100% sure if I'm right yet.

Step-by-step explanation:

In step one, AGE and HGB are verticle angles since they are opposite of each other. then step two is alternate interior angles because they are interior angles opposite of each other, self-explanatory. the reason I choose the transitive property over the corresponding angles theorem is because the transitive property states: among A B and C, if A=B and B=c then A=C and in this case since AGE=HGB andHGB=CHE then AGE=CHE. I hope this helps and if you know the right answer just put it in the comments, if I'm wrong ofc.  

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which expression is equivalent to 34 ⋅ 3−9? 1 over 3 to the 13th power 1 over 3 to the 5th power 35 313
    11·2 answers
  • Please find the area of this
    5·1 answer
  • Mr. Chavez's third-graders go to gym class at 11:15. Students rotate through three activities for 8 minute each. Lunch begins at
    5·1 answer
  • The distance between 19 and -15 on a number line is 4?
    10·1 answer
  • Mr. Smith started his own business making sweatshirts. It costs him $15 for the sweatshirt, $3 for the designs, and $.50 for del
    6·1 answer
  • This recipe makes 24 portions of potato soup. Richard follows the recipe but wants to make 8 portions. Complete the amounts of e
    6·1 answer
  • - If you can buy one jar of crushed ginger
    15·1 answer
  • Find you equation of the line shown
    6·2 answers
  • Find the value P(7, 2) probability ​
    12·1 answer
  • What is the solution set of x2 + 5x- 5 = 0? oss-355 S +385 o sus S* o {stay -S-345 , 30 O S=5+375 5+3/5 2 0 --375 -5 +385 2
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!