Funny, this looks like a complex graph, until you realize that the numerator can be written like (x+3)(x-9).
So really, this is a straight line f(x) = x-9.
But wait, there's a catch. x≠3, because that would divide by zero. So in your straight line, you have to draw a "hole" at (3,6)
what is this number? 1,010,020,030,040,050,060,070,080,090,010,020,030,040,050,060,070,080,090,010,020,030,040,050,060,070,080,0
Andrei [34K]
Answer:
that isn't a number
Step-by-step explanation:
The circumference is (2 pi) (radius) . The ratio of radius to circumference is (1)/(2 pi).
Answer:
True. See the explanation and proof below.
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we need to remeber the definition of linear transformation.
Let A and B be vector spaces with same scalars. A map defined as T: A >B is called a linear transformation from A to B if satisfy these two conditions:
1) T(x+y) = T(x) + T(y)
2) T(cv) = cT(v)
For all vectors
and for all scalars
. And A is called the domain and B the codomain of T.
Proof
For this case the tranformation proposed is t:
Where
For this case we have the following assumption:
1) The transpose of an nxm matrix is an nxm matrix
And the following conditions:
2) 
And we can express like this 
3) If
and
then we have this:

And since we have all the conditions satisfied, we can conclude that T is a linear transformation on this case.
Answer:
0.3
Step-by-step explanation:
x is the number to be added to 0.7 to have a sum of 1.


