I'm confident in debates when I have facts, and good examples.
If you are assigned to write about whether or not you like something or whether it's a good or bad example of a category, you are most likely expected to write in the genre of compare and contrast
<h3>What is Compare and Contrast?</h3>
This refers to the type of writing that is used to show the differences and similarities in two or more entities.
Hence, we can see that If you are assigned to write about whether or not you like something or whether it's a good or bad example of a category, you are most likely expected to write in the genre of compare and contrast.
Read more about compare and contrast here:
brainly.com/question/9087023
#SPJ1
He was right because he was protecting his land and people living on the land. He knew that he was a threat for his land's future. Metis have send many notes and list of rules they need but still the Canadian government was coming and being rude with metis
He was wrong to execute Thomas scott. Luis riel should have thrown Thomas Scott into a jail and ask him why he is so rude and why they dont listen to their suggestions. The Canadian government are the ones who sent Thomas Scott to Red river and claim it to Canadian's. If the Canadian government would listen to Metis, Thomas Scott wouldn't had been excecuted.
Hope this helped. >.< ( > _ < )
The president is your answer .-.
