Answer:
most likely will not be held responsible because of the business judgment rule.
Explanation:
A business judgement rule is a legal provision that protects the board of a company from frivolous legal actions as flregards its business decisions.
Boards of companies are assumed to act in good faith, within their fiduciary standards of loyalty, prudence and care that the board owes to shareholders.
It will have to be proven that the board blatantly violated a code of conduct, otherwise the court will review or question it's decisions.
Answer:
Interest expense $ 11.15
Explanation:
As the bank uses the average daily balance excluding new purchases we should use that amount to solve for the interest expense.
The rate is one and a half percent therefore, 1.5% --> 0.015
principal x rate = interest
$743 x 0.015 = $ 11.145
Answer:
$102,000
Explanation:
According to 26 US code Section 704(c) - Partner's distributive share :
Taxable gain to be recognized from sale = Sale value - ( Partner's share * Fair market value )
Brooke contributed the land, the gain realized before the land was contributed = $120,000 - $90,000 will be allocated entirely to her. She will also be allocated 40% of the gain after the contribution was made = ($150,000 - $120,000) x 40% = $30,000 x 40% = $12,000.
So the total gain recognized by Brooke will be $90,000 + $12,000 = $102,000.
Partnerships are pass through entities, the partners are taxed, not the partnership itself.
Answer:
$15
Explanation:
Average fixed cost = Total fixed cost / quantity
Total fixed cost = Total cost - Total variable cost
= $150,000 - $75,000 = $75,000
Average fixed cost = $75,000 /5000 = $15
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
The principle in Law 'Nemo dat quod non habet' states that an individual connot give what he does not have
Indeed Tom can rescind the contract with Matthew as he possesses voidable title to the balls
Explanation:
Until consideration has moved from Matthew to Tom the validity of the agreement/Contract remains inconclusive.
Considering his Account is not funded means he has no valid title to the Balls, he is merely in possession of the Balls but not the Owner.
Tom can sue demanding a return of the Balls irrespective of Matthew having sold them to Aaron.
Another illustration could be given of a thief who sells off a property. Inspite of the Buyer being unaware, because the thief has a voidable title it makes the transaction invalid.
