1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Evgesh-ka [11]
3 years ago
11

Was the Indian Removal Act justifiable? Think from the perspective of your historical role (Andrew Jackson)

Social Studies
1 answer:
erica [24]3 years ago
7 0
To Andrew Jackson, the Indian Removal Act was justifiable. He thought that the Natives could now go and be freed from the power of the states, along with pursuing their own happiness in their own ways. By doing so, they would be able to establish a civilized community while remaining separated from immediate contact with whites. Andrew Jackson believed the Indian Removal Act would be beneficial. However, the Indian removal act was not justifiable to the Natives, because they did not receive things that they had been promised and the overall act was Unconstitutional. Andrew Jackson ignored the fact that removing the Natives with force was unconstitutional.
You might be interested in
In this lesson, you learned about North Carolina’s role in the American Revolution. You will now demonstrate your understanding
guapka [62]

Answer:

Paul Revere's Ride and the Battles of Lexington and Concord. ... At Concord, the British were met by hundreds of militiamen. Outnumbered and running low on ammunition, the British column was forced to retire to Boston. On the return march, American snipers took a deadly toll on the British.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
SDG 16.7
kari74 [83]

Answer:

hwo the actual hell knows...

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
To test a theory of mind, an experimenter showed the child a box of crayons and asked what was in the box, the child answered 'c
olasank [31]

Answer:Crayons

Explanation:I dont know why

5 0
3 years ago
What is the importance of the rule of law​
svetoff [14.1K]

Answer:

The importance of the rule of law with these principles is self-evident. In our system, it is the foundation of governance. Under the rule of law, citizens can live and work safely. They will not be subjected to arbitrary government and are protected against any abuse of power by the state.

Explanation:

put it in your own words tho

7 0
3 years ago
The map shows the Gupta Empire.
nika2105 [10]

Answer:

A.  

Samudra Gupta was the emperor who gained the most land.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was life like in Rome?
    8·1 answer
  • The primary aggressor in a domestic relationship is: The first person who strikes The person who exercises power and control ove
    12·1 answer
  • How were religion and learning linked in mayan society?
    10·1 answer
  • Did dr king believe in capitalism
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following results is NOT a way that trade can benefit all parties involved?
    6·2 answers
  • Sara, a therapist, tries to understand her clients' experiences and reflect it back to them in a compassionate way. She feels th
    11·1 answer
  • (please help asap please answer with reasonable answer)
    15·1 answer
  • What is the major difference between the National Park Service (NPS) and the United States Forest Service (USFS)
    14·1 answer
  • Question 7 of 10
    7·1 answer
  • N the middle of the twentieth century, sociologists shifted their focus to blank______.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!