1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Daniel [21]
3 years ago
11

Which of the following is intended to frighten a first-time offender into not committing future crimes?

Law
1 answer:
MrMuchimi3 years ago
7 0

Explanation:

harsh first time sentencing

You might be interested in
What are the differences between long run and short run in economics<br>​
Ghella [55]

Answer:

The long run is a period of time in which all factors of production and costs are variable. In the long run, firms are able to adjust all costs.

The short run firms are only able to influence prices through adjustments made to production levels.

3 0
3 years ago
4. How much were her medical bills?
Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer:

too much, medical bills are expensive, if you actually wanted a real answer I'm going to need the rest of the question

5 0
2 years ago
Here are four amendments to the Constitution about who can vote. Describe one of them.
Anvisha [2.4K]

Answer:

Citizens eighteen (18) and older can vote.

Explanation:

Yes, according to the Constitution the citizen who is 18 or older has the right to vote!

Hope it helps!

7 0
3 years ago
SKYRIM TOPIC Whats yalls favorite race from the elder scrolls Skyrim this includes all 10 races My personal favorite is the khaj
shutvik [7]

Answer:

Breton

Explanation:

Because they are so resilient and pretty much everyone has magic at some point and Breton can resist that so I'm always choosing Breton

3 0
2 years ago
The doctrine of contributory negligence is followed in most states is called
xeze [42]

Answer:

The doctrine of contributory negligence is followed in most states is false.

Explanation:

Contributory negligence is a doctrine of common law that if a person was injured in part due to his/her own negligence, that is his/her negligence contributed to the accident, the injured party would not be entitled to collect any damages (money) from another party who supposedly caused the accident.

And historically, contributory negligence was the rule in all states, leading to harsh results. Many states now developed and adopted comparative negligence laws. Today, the jurisdictions that still use contributory negligence are few.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain how a case gets from trial court to the supreme court.
    15·1 answer
  • The US Constitution Scavenger Hunt
    12·2 answers
  • Someone help me find out his Mac 10 class
    14·1 answer
  • What was historically significant about Mosaic Law?
    10·2 answers
  • What do you do when your grouned?
    10·1 answer
  • Do you think you would be able to memorize all the 10-codes on the list, or would you have to refer to a chart?
    7·1 answer
  • Franz Joseph Gull suggested that a person's what could predict their criminal tendencies?
    11·1 answer
  • 4. What is important when using technology?
    11·2 answers
  • State a proposition of policy and demonstrate
    15·1 answer
  • What does deputy governor danforth represent or symbolize in the court?.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!