<span>ART BY THOMAS POROSTOCKY</span>PRO: RESEARCH ON GENE EDITING IN HUMANS MUST CONTINUE
By John Harris
<span>John Harris is professor emeritus in science ethics at University of Manchester, U.K., and the author of How to be Good, Oxford University Press 2016.</span>
In February of this year, the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority in the United Kingdom approved a request by the Francis Crick Institute in London to modify human embryos using the new gene editing technique CRISPR-Cas9. This is the second time human embryos have been employed in such research, and the first time their use has been sanctioned by a national regulatory authority. The scientists at the Institute hope to cast light on early embryo development—work which may eventually lead to safer and more successful fertility treatments.
The embryos, provided by patients undergoing in vitro fertilization, will not be allowed to develop beyond seven days. But in theory—and eventually in practice—CRISPR could be used to modify disease-causing genes in embryos brought to term, removing the faulty script from the genetic code of that person’s future descendants as well. Proponents of such “human germline editing” argue that it could potentially decrease, or even eliminate, the incidence of many serious genetic diseases, reducing human suffering worldwide. Opponents say that modifying human embryos is dangerous and unnatural, and does not take into account the consent of future generations.
Answer:where’s the image to help out?
Explanation:
The South did a lot to defend its right to maintain slavery. They continuously pressured the north and the Union to leave more liberty to the states, which effectively meant allowing the states to decide if they want to have slavery. They forced through a number of laws, such as the Second Amendment, which allowed militias to defend the states, but in the South the Militias were slave patrols, so this among others, led to a protection of slavers in the South.
The ethical principle of "Debriefing" means that participants must be told the true purpose and nature of an experiment after it is over.
If participants have been misled, they must be informed of this and explained. Asking them if they have any questions is necessary, and any queries they may have should be answered honestly and completely.
Experimenters should take reasonable measures to ensure that participants understand debriefing, and debriefing should occur as soon after the experiment as practicable and be as thorough as possible.
The goal of the debriefing is to clear up any misunderstandings and concerns that the participants may have regarding the research and to leave them feeling knowledgeable, dignified, and like their time was not wasted.
Hence, the Ethical Principle of Debriefing is used to keep participants informed after a psychological experiment.
Learn more about Ethical Principles of Psychology at brainly.com/question/11974576
#SPJ4
