Answer:b
Explanation:why bc it can't be d or a and c. Not all characters want to try and figure it out .
The similarities between Hamilton and Jefferson are not many as both men had very different ideas for the United States
The given scenario is an example of a selection-history effect.
Option D
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
In group-based research, selection-history effect assesses the behaviour displayed by the test subjects before and after the test. Since it is a history threat or effect, it means the outcomes of the results will be affected by the individual’s past experiences.
The individuals in the research have different pasts, and while the control group may have performed worse, it shows that there are other factors influencing motor control. It may be a bad experience with bad driving at a younger age, or some have a phobia to driving.
Answer:
For many centuries, natural law was recognized as a type of higher law that spelled out universal truths for the moral ordering of society based on a rational understanding of human nature. As a higher moral law, it gave citizens a standard for determining if the written laws and customs of their nation or any other nation were just or unjust, right or wrong, humane or inhumane. Today, natural law is not discussed very much, at least not explicitly. When mentioned at all, it is usually rejected as dangerous because it undermines existing laws or as intolerant because it is contrary to “multiculturalism,” which requires the non-judgmental acceptance of other cultures.
This negative view of natural law can be traced to Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679), whose writings are largely devoted to showing the anarchy and civil wars caused by appeals to natural and divine laws above the will of the sovereign. Hobbes rejected traditional higher law doctrines and encouraged people to accept the established laws and customs of their nations, even if they seemed oppressive, for the sake of civil peace and security. His critique has been a leading cause of the demise of natural law and the acceptance of positive law as the only reliable guide for political authority.
One may be equally surprised to learn, however, that many people today embrace a different (and seemingly contradictory) view of natural law, and this too is traceable to Thomas Hobbes. For example, when conscientious people are confronted with violations of human rights—as in religious theocracies that violate women’s rights or in countries that allow sweatshops to trample on worker’s rights—they feel compelled to protest the injustice of those practices and to change them for the better. The protesters usually deny that they are following natural law, but they obviously are asserting a belief in universal moral truths that are grounded in human nature—in this case, the natural equality of human beings that underlies human rights. This understanding of higher law originates with Hobbes because he was largely responsible for transforming classical natural law into modern natural rights, thereby beginning the “human rights revolution” in thinking on natural law. How is it possible for Hobbes and his followers to embrace seemingly contradictory views of natural law, rejecting one form as intolerant, self-righteous, and anarchical, while embracing another form as the universal ideal of social justice? Let us turn to Hobbes for an answer to this puzzle, and, in so doing, uncover the sources of our modern conceptions of law, rights, and justice.
Answer:
The correct answer is B.learn the maze more quickly than rats that have never been exposed to the maze.
Explanation:
Operant conditioning studies have shown that animals' learn something faster when their behavior is being reinforced. There are four types of reinforcement, and rewarding in one of them. Rewarding means adding something that is considered good or likable to motivate a desired behavior. In the case of the rats, the reward is food. When they understand food will be given after a certain behavior is carried out, the rats begin to learn that behavior faster.
