<em><u>Explanation:</u></em>
<em><u>Explanation:Gandaki province is home to various best tourist destinations in Nepal as Gandaki is very rich in natural heritage and cultural diversity. ... Since Gandaki is rich in both culture and natural beauty the province is the most appropriate place for the tourist destinations.</u></em>
Answer:
A. chart A
Explanation:
As you may already know, GDP is the acronym that represents all the production of products and services that a country has produced within a certain period of time.
In the case of New Zealand, GDP is influenced by services, industrial products and agricultural products. Despite having a considerable agricultural production, agriculture is only responsible for about 5% of the country's GDP, with most of the GDP influenced by the provision of services, which accounts for 71% and the industrial sector, which accounts for 24 %.
Racism is a mentality. It is where a group of people use the race of another group as an excuse to treat them inferior. In many causes, it starts with one race separating a heinous act that a part of another race does and then apply it to the entire race as a whole. The problem with reducing racism to the actions and thoughts of people is we miss the big picture. Most people try to be good and fit in with society; however, some people can't do this because they don't understand why what they do/think is not socially acceptable. These people often think that they are in the right and those opposing them are in the wrong. A good example of this is the enslavement of Africans. There is a passage in the Bible that refers to Ham, the son of Noah, acting out against his father, and in return his skin gets blemished or darkened making him inferior and showing the crime he did against his father. This was the main excuse for enslavement of those with darker skin for generations, and if it was in their most sacred book, how could it possibly be wrong?
You mean you're looking for arguments against such a quota?
I can see 2:
- some people might say that it's too little, and it symbolically shows that women don't have any much power than men
- other people who don't want a quota at all would say that a quota would lead to people getting into the parliament without a qualifiction, just because there needed to be enough of such and such people: it's better to just let people decide